|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
March 24, 2007DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun RightsClever move by Republicans. From the Washington Post:
For practical purposes, DC probably should have a congressional presence but let's face it, any congressmen or senators they elect would be die-hard Democrats, liberals. Anyway, I'm not sure it's even constitutional. Still, if this is the first move by DC residents towards eventual statehood, then the residents themselves deserve the full range of rights enjoyed by citizens of the other 50 states -- well, most of them, anyway -- such as the right to keep and bear arms as specified in the Bill of Rights. Comments
If they can't be trusted with a firearm why the hell would I trust them with something dangerous like a vote? Posted by: vinnie at March 24, 2007 02:43 PMThe Founders didn't give DC any representation for a reason: so Congress wouldn't favor it. Personally, I don't see why DC needs to have a population. The Feds should buy up all the land and use it for government offices. They could lease out some space for restaurants and stuff as needed. And I think any DC representation bill *should* be immediately shot down in court, since the Constitution specifically only gives representation to states, which DC is not. Posted by: Heartless Libertarian at March 24, 2007 03:02 PMDc is a joke. It was only created in order to throw a bone to the South before the Civil War. Cede the district to Maryland and be done with it. Posted by: Yosemite Sam at March 24, 2007 04:59 PM"... and remove criminal penalties for possessing unregistered guns." According to one comment (at Volokh.com?), passing a federal law undoing D.C.'s gun law would moot the D.C. decision, so that no appeal could be brought and the Supreme Court would not hear the case. Not sure which way I'd rather it go. Posted by: Munango-Keewati at March 25, 2007 12:25 AMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |