Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right"
--Guardian (UK) 6/26/06

*******************


Yeah, so?


Even my cats
have guns!

serbu_sidebar_125.jpg
Me with Serbu BFG-50

Email me at:
gunnut -at-
alphecca -dot- com

Check it out:

My group sci-fi blog novel:

Colony: Alchibah






Featured in
Outdoor Life Magazine:

outdoor_small.jpg

Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer"

Alphecca gets noticed!
Check out these
GLOWING REVIEWS
I've just made up:

"Sparkles like pewter"
-- Collector's World

"Wonderful, terrific, splendid"
-- Roget's Thesaurus

"Really good"
-- Stereo World, Gun World,
Car World, Travel World,
Computer World, Roger Ebert,
Martha Stewart, Barney, etc...

"I am not an idiut"
--Barbra Streisand



Proud to be an American
US Flag
standing with Israel
Flag of Israel

PageSpinner

...but all errors and sloppy code should be blamed on me...

All non-credited writings
and photos on
Alphecca.com are
(C) Copyright
2002-2008
by Jeff Soyer
All rights reserved.



March 06, 2007

New Jersey to Ban .50 Caliber Guns

Well why not? They already ban almost everything else and you actually need the local police chief's permission to buy a simple Daisy BB gun. Ghod, why does anyone who believes in freedom still live there? From the Philadelphia Inquirer:


- Democratic lawmakers and Ceasefire NJ, an antigun group, released a plan yesterday to make it illegal to sell .50-caliber weapons in New Jersey. If the legislation is passed, the state would become the second after California to have such a law.

Supporters say the guns are inappropriate for civilian use because they can fire armor-piercing rounds that could penetrate and ignite chemical plants, refineries and rail tank cars. The guns, which resemble hunting rifles, are accurate up to 11/2 miles. "We can wait for the first time mayhem occurs in our country before we ban civilian sale of these weapons," said Bryan Miller, Ceasefire NJ executive director, "but then dozens of people will likely have died."


The Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs and others are planning to fight the bill but given the mentality of liberals in the state, I suspect this will pass. Because, you know, there have been so many instances of chemical plants, refineries, and rail tank cars blown-up throughout the state.

There's no problem but we have a solution, anyway.

Once again the law abiding must suffer because something that hasn't happened yet, might happen, and therefore we need to ban a thing.

The news story notes that antique guns and "traditional rifles" that fire a single shot would be exempt. Hmmm, my Serbu BFG-50 was a traditional, bolt-action, single shot...


bfg_at_range_425.jpg
Me, blowing up a refinery in Thetford, VT...


Oops! I spoke too soon:

"This is not a weapon that any sportsman or gun enthusiast needs," said Gregory Paw, director of the Division of Criminal Justice in the Attorney General's office, who said he became familiar with the .50-caliber's power while on an 11-month tour of duty in Iraq two years ago.

Paw joined three lawmakers and representatives of Ceasefire NJ at a Statehouse news conference urging action on a bill (S-1498) that would prohibit possession of the .50-caliber shells and the bolt-action rifles that fire them. They spoke at a podium set up behind a black, 4-foot long .50-caliber rifle.

The bill would add the weapons to an existing list of weapons banned as "destructive devices."

A person possessing .50-caliber weapons, if they did not own them before passage of the bill, would be guilty of a third-degree crime, and would face a $15,000 fine and three to five years in prison under the legislation.


Well, there are a lot of things that sportsmen and enthusiasts don't need. There are a lot of really fast sports cars that driving enthusiasts "don't need" that could be used to violate highway speed limits -- that's not a sufficient reason to ban them.

Here's where the BS gets really thick:


Backers of the measure insisted the bill was about public safety rather than gun control.

The .50-caliber weapons could fire bullets through a police officer's protective vest, or could give a terrorist the ability to shoot down an aircraft or touch off a devasting fire at a chemical plant, in an oil tanker or in other settings, Miller said.


No, NO, NO! They can't bring down an 'effing airplane. In response to false claims by the Violence Policy Center, Ronnie Barrett wrote to me:

Jeff,

Those are all VPC mis-quotes, Barrett had a Military brochure about 18 years ago that read;

“Heavy Firepower for light infantry:

This revolutionary Light .50 allows sophisticated targets to be destroyed or disabled by a single soldier. Armored personnel carriers, radar dishes, communications vehicles, aircraft and area denial summations are all vulnerable to the quick strike capability of the Barrett 82A1.”

After the first gulf war the Marines added SCUD missiles to the list. Of course all of these would have to be on the ground.

No military in the world is training its soldier to use the Barrett rifle to engage flying platforms of any kind. One would be quite foolish to suggest it, and more the fool to believe it, and regretfully, more to print it.

Barrett has information for civilian sport shooting and another for military uses and another for police. The VPC covers this up and represents to the lawmakers that we are irresponsibly marketing our product to the law-abiding citizen with these tactical scenarios.

This is the smoke that the VPC uses to deceive the legislators that don’t do their homework on topics they will be voting on.

Ronnie


But that makes no difference to these idiot legislators. Here's their new rational as quoted in the NJ.Com article:

"This is not about gun control," said Assemblyman Michael Panter (D-Monmouth), sponsor of an Assembly version of the bill that was introduced last month. "This is about homeland security. It's about the safety of our uniformed police officers."

So just because nothing has actually happened, we'll make it a "homeland security" issue, or a "cop safety" issue. Anything to make anyone trying to defend ownership of .50 caliber firearms look guilty of supporting terrorism or other crimes.

Folks, you know the truth; it IS about gun control and it always will be. And another bit of freedom gets chipped away at...

Posted by Jeff Soyer at March 6, 2007 07:23 AM
Comments

Scary stuff. It makes me want to get myself a .50 before MA gets around to banning them, which I'm sure it will. Want to sell your Serbu? Another thing, You need the chief of police's permission to buy an f-ing bb gun in Jersy? Are you kidding me?

Posted by: The Lone Gunman at March 6, 2007 08:17 AM

Like most gun laws, a solution in search of a problem.

Posted by: BobG at March 6, 2007 08:33 AM

Jeff,

Two things. First, I only partially agree with your comment "...it IS about gun control and it always will be." I would add "as a means of control over people." That is what politicians are all about these days.

Second: If you can find the "Penn and Teller" on gun control, they interview a manufacturer of rail tanker cars who scoffs at the idea that a .50 can penetrate one of his cars.

Peet

Posted by: Peet at March 6, 2007 09:07 AM

Has anyone pointed out that chemical plants and refineries tend to blow up on a depressingly frequent basis? It's a common enough hazard that they're designed for it. I used to do embedded systems for the pipeline industries and anything that was going to a chem plant or refinery had to be made / programmed with explosions in mind. Mostly to avoid causing them, of course, but also to survive them when they seemingly inevitably happened.

I'll bet if you check the papers that NJ has had at least one 'incident' in the past six months - probably more than that if you could get the details but at least one that got mentioned, albeit on page B-6.

And I can think of a scenario where you could hit a plane in flight with a rifle shot without relying on pure luck. You'd have to be on the centerline of the runway (not necessarily the runway itself, just lined up with it and close by) and tag it just before landing / just after takeoff. Don't think you could do much to a plane taking off that they'd even notice except pop a round through the passenger compartment and scare the folks nearby, but maybe a shot into the cockpit during landing would be enough to cause an 'incident'. Of course if it did you'd be laying right in the path of said incident...

If you really wanted to disrupt commercial air travel you'd be much better off by just being the TSA.

Posted by: KCSteve at March 6, 2007 01:31 PM

Was that at a range of 11/2 miles, or 1 and 1/2 miles, for this .50 rifle?

Because 11/2=5.5 miles, which would be far beyond line-of-sight for a person standing on a level plain.

Just one more small thing to question in this large, questionable piece.

Posted by: karrde at March 6, 2007 01:46 PM

Can't a .308 penetrate all of those things (tanker cars, petroleum storage containers, police armor vests [minus ceramic plates, or with a few rounds so that the first ones will break the plate, as I understand the process works])?

And if the .50BMG is banned, won't people just put the same weight and powder charge behind a new cartridge based off the .50BMG brass, with a slightly less wide bullet (say a .490"", and thus get around the Evil .50" Ban?

Well, yes, of course they will, but don't bother telling a lawmaker that.

Or that nobody, as far as we know, has ever used a .50BMG in any sort of criminal activity, or that actual terrorists are far more likely to use bombs or RPGs, rather than buying ridiculously expensive .50 bolt action rifles in the US?

I mean, it's not like our borders are so secure it'd be difficult for a terrorist organisation to smuggle in a few RPG-7s. Or acquire/create some high explosives here in the US. And both of those are FAR more dangerous than a .50BMG.

You shoot a .50 AP round into a petroleum storage container and you get... a half-inch hole that oil spurts out of.

Posted by: Sigivald at March 6, 2007 03:37 PM

Years back, I had an uncle that was Chief of Police in Bayonne.

I can tell you for a fact that he was dead set against civilians having/owning/using weapons of any kind.

Glad I didn't/don't live there.

Posted by: Daniel at March 6, 2007 08:37 PM


"This is not a weapon that any sportsman or gun enthusiast needs," said Gregory Paw, director of the Division of Criminal Justice in the Attorney General's office, who said he became familiar with the .50-caliber's power while on an 11-month tour of duty in Iraq two years ago."

Didn't this guy have to take an oath to uphold the Constitution? It's really too bad they don't hang these kind of politicians for treason...

Posted by: gudis at March 6, 2007 09:39 PM

No honest politician needs such publicity...

Posted by: Keith at March 7, 2007 05:14 AM

NJ has been overrun by our enemies, and is lost.

Posted by: geekWitha.45 at March 7, 2007 12:10 PM

Don't these poeple realize that bullet proof vests really are not bullet proof angainst all things.Besides having worked in law enforcement I always lead to the next question. Even if a bullet proof vest did stop everything. What stops some one from shootting you in the head!!!!Besides this is just an excuse for some one in polotics to think there doing something that matters. Apperently they forget about the bigger issues like the fact that NJ my state is bankrupt. Inpart because of wasting there time with trivial bills such as this. Who cares about paying there teachers and even there cops or better yet worried about paying the poeple that actually run there state. Im not talking about the poloticians ....Im talking about the poeple that really make a difference in New Jersey...

Posted by: Nick at March 7, 2007 11:34 PM
Note: Comments close down on posts after seven days and then
the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that.

By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...



Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah.
See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips.