Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right"
--Guardian (UK) 6/26/06

*******************


Yeah, so?


Even my cats
have guns!

serbu_sidebar_125.jpg
Me with Serbu BFG-50

Email me at:
gunnut -at-
alphecca -dot- com

Check it out:

My group sci-fi blog novel:

Colony: Alchibah






Featured in
Outdoor Life Magazine:

outdoor_small.jpg

Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer"

Alphecca gets noticed!
Check out these
GLOWING REVIEWS
I've just made up:

"Sparkles like pewter"
-- Collector's World

"Wonderful, terrific, splendid"
-- Roget's Thesaurus

"Really good"
-- Stereo World, Gun World,
Car World, Travel World,
Computer World, Roger Ebert,
Martha Stewart, Barney, etc...

"I am not an idiut"
--Barbra Streisand



Proud to be an American
US Flag
standing with Israel
Flag of Israel

PageSpinner

...but all errors and sloppy code should be blamed on me...

All non-credited writings
and photos on
Alphecca.com are
(C) Copyright
2002-2008
by Jeff Soyer
All rights reserved.



February 10, 2007

Best 9mm Pistol?

Like sports nuts, gun nuts can argue day and night over what they think are the best guns, ammo, etc. While I own a variety of different ammo'd pistols, I generally like 9mm for target practice (ammo is cheap) and carry (small/high capacity). Not a powerful round but it'll do. Anyway, Strategy Page asks, who makes the best 9mm?


Which is the best 9mm handgun in service? Handguns are nowhere near as effective as rifles in combat, but they still have their uses, so this matter is relevant for troops. The bullets from handguns are much slower (about half as fast) than rifles.

A number of nine-millimeter service pistols are in service. In general, these pistols weigh around two pounds, are about seven-and-a-half to nine inches long, with a barrel about four to five inches long, and usually hold anywhere from 12 to 18 rounds. There are several 9mm pistols in wide service, that can be considered candidates for the best in class.


They go on to list the Browning Hi-Power, Glock 17, Beretta 92, and a couple others. Rudely, they left out mine:


taurus_909.jpg
My Taurus PT 909


Fires any old ammo (the gun has yet to misfeed or bobble a round! This after several thousand rounds of all types over the past year) and with 17-round magazines plus one in the chamber... Smallish grips 'cause I have small hands, accurate and bright night-sights and probably the easiest pistol to strip and re-assemble that I've ever owned. And it cost me $450 buck in tax-free NH. What's not to love?

Update: I notice that this is a pretty popular post for "Google searches" and thought that those of you -- especially first time handgun buyers -- might find this post very useful, too. It gives my opinions on what makes a good first gun, and the comments to it are quite robust and offer a lot more advice.

Posted by Jeff Soyer at February 10, 2007 07:16 AM
Comments

I really like the Ruger P89 myself. May not be the best looking sidearm out there, but it's a fine piece of equipment. Inexpensive, quite accurate and will eat anything one feeds it. What more could you ask for?

Posted by: the pistolero at February 10, 2007 05:43 PM

First pistol I ever fired was an M1911, and I never thought there could be a handgun I liked better. Fired a S&W 9 mm in the early sixties and thought it a bit light, but easy to use. Last year I bought a Springfield XD-9, 5" barrel, and fell in love. It fit my hand, and when I stuck my arm out it seemed to almost always be on target.
I wanted something smaller for carry, so I bought an XD-9 sub-compact (3" barrel), and darned if it don't shoot even better! I even did good left-handed and single-handed. I've only put about 350 rounds of 115 gr. FMJ through the two of them, but no hangups yet. I don't think I'll need to buy another pistol.

Posted by: Texas Jack at February 10, 2007 06:19 PM

Glock 19. Every place. All the time.

Posted by: Robert at February 10, 2007 08:04 PM

I have a huge problem in that I believe any handgun that starts with a caliber number lower than 4 is suspect, with one exception, and that is the 7.62 (.30cal)x25mm. But it is damn hard to carry a 1911A1 in .45 cal concealed. My CZ52 is just about the same size, I am not a particular fan of 9mm but there are a lot more options for small carry high cap, than my ideal fighting weapons at close range. Ideal doesn't do much for you if you had to leave it at home.. However, I have't found a 9mm with the same general grip angle as the 1911. It is so natural I hate to give it up. I know there are several full size 9's that meet this one spec. but I haven't found one yet in compact or less. Anybody?

Posted by: straightarrow at February 10, 2007 10:19 PM

Hey Jeff,

Do not forget the many nice Sig semi-autos.

I like Sigs for the placement of the controls, reliability and just plain Swiss quality, while I prefer the Beretta for fit.

I especially like the SIG P239, which would be my carry piece when I move to a state that allows mere citizens to carry. (I'll be up at freedom fest in NH in a couple weeks gathering info on the area).

I also like the S&W 342, for lightweight carry when running or cycling, if only I could in this state. Though it is a nasty little stinger to shoot with anything other than the lightest loads.

As much of a genius as John Browning was, he must have had some seriously large hands considering where he put the controls on the 1911. I just cannot shoot those things one handed and use the slide release without twisting the gun out of action. I do not have that problem with Berettas or SIG's.

My perfect handgun would probably be made after a merger of Beretta and SIG.


Posted by: tomWright at February 11, 2007 12:23 PM

Anyone who's looking to a good 9mm should definitely check out the Springfield XD in 9mm. I carry a subcompact in 9mm every day and love it. It's got the reliability of a Glock, and some of the safety features that the Glock is missing, in my opinion.

The ergonomics are great as well..

Check it out!

Posted by: Del Simmons at February 11, 2007 07:51 PM

Ruger P95 and Beretta 92FS, both reliable and will feed anything.

Posted by: Diamondback at February 13, 2007 08:44 AM

Come ON People, Where's the CZ-75 love? Hard to beat on rugged reliability. Impossible to beat on value. Available in a version to suit any need: Tactical/ Full size / Compact. Ambidextrous version (CZ-85). Cocked and locked / SA\DA / Decocker. With or without rail. Competition versions. etc. There's something for everybody.

Also, while I've never actually shot one, I've never known of a Kahr owner who didn't gush about the things.

Posted by: anon at February 13, 2007 10:17 AM

It is a weird omission too since the Taurus line has a pretty high profile. The Taurus OSS .45 ACP just got a glowing review in American Rifleman this month (yeah, not the 9mm but...)

Posted by: Wildmonk at February 14, 2007 08:11 PM

I have to second the CZ-75 as a wonderful 9mm pistol. Not as easy to shoot as a Glock 9mm in my opinion.

But it is heavy enough to use as a bludgeon when you run out of reloads. ;-)

Posted by: RonInAz at February 14, 2007 09:17 PM
Note: Comments close down on posts after seven days and then
the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that.

By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...



Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah.
See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips.