|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
December 14, 2006When Nannies ConflictHere's a strange one! From News 14, Charlotte (NC):
There's another reason for those bars. Matter of fact, I believe that in many cities such as NYC, bars are required on some windows to prevent young children from falling out and to their deaths from high building windows. So, this is a perfect example of what happens when you adopt the 'Nanny State" model of government. Do you protect your wards for escape from a fire, or to prevent burglaries, or to prevent tots from dropping five stories to their deaths? Comments
I'd go for a ban on City Councils. Jack. Posted by: Jack Lorenz at December 14, 2006 09:19 AMSimple solution: bars that are rigged so they open outward when you press on the upper portion. Actually you want them to rotate like the one-way gates that used to be common in the bad old 'pre accessiblity' days. That way you can get out when you want, bad guys can't get in, and short people are trapped inside. Ok, there's the minor problem of getting flaming short people out, but it's an imperfect world. Posted by: KCSteve at December 14, 2006 01:13 PMI say we put the council members behind bars... My house has bars on the lower window that's big enough for someone to enter (came with the house, though they're reassuring), and sure enough there's a simple turn-latch on the inside to allow them to swing open. I don't see the issue, honestly. KCSteve: Tricky to do that without making it possible for someone outside to trip the latch using a probe or simply by reaching in, even without the flaming midget problem. Posted by: Sigivald at December 14, 2006 02:01 PMI think we should pass a law requiring all nanny statists to be dropped to their deaths from a five story window. Gerry N. Posted by: Gerry N. at December 14, 2006 06:42 PMisn't that why we have smoke detectors? To WARN YOU to get out? Do we remove the bars from prisons in case the prisoners can't get out if there's a fire? problem. reaction. solution. problem-we need more police powers, and money. reaction- force people to remove means of keeping criminals out of their homes. solution- CHA-CHING $$$$$$
Our house came with really neat windows. All of the windows - including the patio door - are double-pane with built-in bars. They've got 1/2" flat steel strap formed into 'panes' between the actual panes of glass. Makes them look like they're the old fashioned multi-pane windows. The latches are simple and easy to work but only from the inside. To open our windows from the outside you'd have to break through both panes in two places, reach both hands in, rock the latches toward yourself, and lift. From the inside you just put your hands on the latches and lift. Posted by: KCSteve at December 15, 2006 04:23 PMIn answer to the question they will eventually have embraced all the positions posted in the topic's question. Whoever writes the scariest scenario will have the hysterical sheep applauding the "we are doing something" city councils. Before it is all over, bars will go up, down and for each reason listed and some we haven't even thought of yet. The cowards and the councils will feel better and nobody will have been served with any action of substance. Posted by: straightarrow at December 18, 2006 12:46 AMBut hey, when they remove personal choice and freedom of action and responsibility nobody has to ever face the consequences of their own decisions, after all, it was the law. Not my fault, Hey, i didn't do nothing, hey, I had to do what they said. Hey, I had no choice,my hands were tied, I didn't want to get in trouble. etc. etc. etc. Pitiful. Posted by: straightarrow at December 18, 2006 12:50 AMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |