|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
November 22, 2006Brady Bunch Concedes, Gun Control Off Table?Or are they playing ropey-dopey? From USA Today:
That's somewhat of a different tune than he was singing a couple weeks ago but with heavy-hitting senior hacks such as Kennedy and Schumer still setting the real agendas, we shall see... If gun control measures do make it to the House or Senate, we'll also see if newbies like Webb, Tester, and others who ran as pro-gun rights advocates cave in to party pressure. There is some hope, though, that this is for real. From the News Observer:
Heh. Of course, they could just shut up about gun control for two years, hoping to capture the White House and more seats in Congress, and then start in. Or, they could wisely decide that maybe ALL of the Bill of Rights is sacred in which case, as I've said before, they could be the majority party for years to come. Posted by Jeff Soyer at November 22, 2006 07:38 AM Comments
Jeff, I said that before myself. If they want our guns, they have to get the absolute majority and the White House in order to win. I really don't think that the Dhimmis are going to try it with the slim majority they hold now. Posted by: shooter at November 22, 2006 09:33 AMI wouldn't be surprised at them trying for more restrictions, but I think they may try for a more low-key approach, or try a new angle from which to attack. Posted by: BobG at November 22, 2006 01:59 PMI think it's almost a given that Dem. leadership will persue this at some point. The question is, will the freshman remain true to their constituency, or be intimidated by Dick Durbin? And if Carville is serious, I can find a gun for him to use. Just hope he isn't terribly recoil sensitive. Posted by: Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner at November 22, 2006 03:43 PMDon't forget that the gun-controllers have an ally, hiding in the tall grass as it were, in the White House. Bush supported the renewal of the so-called "assault weapons" ban, but didn't push it lest he offend his base even more than he did with open borders, amnesty for illegals, and expanding the Feds both in money and power. Posted by: Ron w at November 22, 2006 04:00 PMYou are right, they won't try anything as big as the AWB within 2 years. However, that does not mean they will not try to repeal the smaller things that have been passed, like manufacturer limitied liability for civil cases. Or funding some of the laws that are currently on the books but not active because no money has been given to them. Posted by: Gunstar1 at November 22, 2006 07:31 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |