|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
September 26, 2006Rally For "Illegal" GunsIn a rally targeting NYC Mayor Michael Blowhard, World Net Daily reports:
Well . . . actually, Leobold, those "tens of thousands of New Yorkers [who] actually own guns" ARE criminals. Rightly or wrongly, if the NY laws say you must register your guns or be licensed to own them, and you don't or aren't, you're a criminal. The way to correct that sorry situation isn't to break the law, it's to work to change the law so your rights are restored. Posted by Jeff Soyer at September 26, 2006 06:53 AM Comments
I'm with Martin Luther King on this one: Moral men don't obey immoral laws- which nearly all gun laws are. I'm VERY happy to see folks protesting IN NYC. They ought to! It MIGHT help change these immoral, racist, unconstitutional, (and therefore illegal) laws. Posted by: robert at September 26, 2006 07:18 AMDitto. Remember "Civil Disobedience"? I often wonder just how many people in CCW states refuse to obtain permits(and carry anyway), because of constitutional beliefs.I do. Who else will admit to it? Posted by: Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner at September 26, 2006 08:24 AMYou are also not allowed to drive at over 65 mph on rt. 495. What's the difference? Jack. Posted by: Jack Lorenz at September 26, 2006 08:47 AMAye, there's nothing stronger than arresting and trying a man who committed the crime of defending his family. Posted by: Darkside007 at September 26, 2006 09:26 AMWell... actually, Jeff, from the Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177: The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having formed in nature of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law in legal contemplation is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it.No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
Not that we can get the Federal prosecutors to enforce this law or avoid jail and an extremely expensive and probably losing battle were we to get caught violating Bloomberg's invalid laws, but still that is the way it reads. Posted by: Joe Huffman at September 26, 2006 10:03 AMrobert said it for me. Gunner is acting like me. I refuse to ask for permission to do what is my right to do. As to how I go about, my business alone. Posted by: straightarrow at September 26, 2006 10:48 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |