|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
July 08, 2006Rudy For Pres? No Thanks.The latest buzz about seems to be that Rudy Giuliani will make a bid for the GOP nomination for president. That's nice and certainly there are qualities I admire about him. He's a tough law-and-order guy, fiscally conservative, socially liberal. I can live with all that. What I can't live with is a president who is totally committed to gun control. He does not support in any way, shape, or form the right to keep and bear arms. Now, it seems many think that he can get around the issue of gun control. A perfect example comes from Gay Patriot:
Just one little problem. Groups such as the Bradys and VPC and the UN don't want gun control to be a state issue. They want it to be a national legislative issue. So do the likes of Di-Fi, Bloomberg, Kennedy, Schumer, Boxer, et al. So when a bill comes fresh through congress -- oh heck, let's say a new "Assault Weapons Ban" -- is Rudy going to veto it because it's an issue that should be decided by each state seperately? You know got-damn well he'll have his pen out in a flash to sign it into law. Sorry but all rights spring from the 2nd and I don't trust Giuliani to protect that one at all. Comments
I'm torn on this one. If Rudy gets the nomination, the Democrats better put someone pro-Gun up. Otherwise I'm going to have to choose between a half-dozen third parties, or taking my chances with Rudy, whom I really admire. jp Posted by: JP at July 8, 2006 05:22 PMInvite Rudy to the range, see if you can change his mind. Posted by: Donna B. at July 9, 2006 10:22 AMmy gut says he won't make it through the primary. he's got alot of baggage that's been pretty polished by his post 9/11 persona but he is at heart, a statist. and you can't polish a statist turd... Posted by: dave at July 9, 2006 03:56 PMAs always Jeff you hit the nail on the head. Watched him for years and knew well he was anti-gun. He will sign are gun rights away. He is not to be trusted. Hillary and Rudy on gun issues are as one. That is a sad commentary on Rudy. Greatness must be judge on he that protect our God given rights! I will not vote for him. Keep up the good work. Posted by: ranger nick at July 9, 2006 08:48 PMDonna B. Rudy is one of the many antis that fully understands the Second Amendment. The problem is that he wants to be one of the elite that gets to rule over us peons and he can't do that if we're armed. Being in favor of gun control is not really a liberal position. Liberal values dictate that the most vulnerable members of a society deserve protection, including elderly people, handicapped people, women and low-income people forced to live in dangerous neighborhoods. The right to possess firearms is the only real chance that a 100 pound woman living in a bad neighborhood has against gangs of much larger, strogner males who police have not been able to eliminate despite decades of anti-gang efforts. It's not the 200 pound man who makes $200k a year and lives in a gated neighborhood who benefits the most from the 2nd amendment. It's the most vulnerable people in our society who had no choice throughout history except to be victims before the advent of access to firearms. Every other weapon depends in some way on superior strength or other traits that these vulnerable people just aren't blessed with. Without access to guns, only the strong survive. That is the antithesis of liberal philosophy. Start pointing this out to liberals rather than insisting that their stance on guns is crucial to their political identity (it isn't) and you'll win a lot more hearts and minds. Remember that Sarah Brady is a life-long Republican and that Ronald Reagan gave several speeches heartily endorsing the assault weapons ban. Rudy Giuliani illustrates the reality of the divide perfectly. Demand for gun control comes from people in cities and suburbs who did not grow up with hunting and the responsible handling of firearms as a part of their lives. It has nothing to do with conservatism or liberalism. They fear what they don't understand just like people who grow up in rural areas where there are few open homosexuals fear gay people. They don't understand it so explain it to them. These are smart people who are capable of seeing sense if only second amendment rights supporters will explain it to them politely and without trying to drag a bunch of other right-wing political issues into the matter. Posted by: Jack at July 12, 2006 10:48 AMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |