Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right"
--Guardian (UK) 6/26/06

*******************


Yeah, so?


Even my cats
have guns!

serbu_sidebar_125.jpg
Me with Serbu BFG-50

Email me at:
gunnut -at-
alphecca -dot- com

Check it out:

My group sci-fi blog novel:

Colony: Alchibah






Featured in
Outdoor Life Magazine:

outdoor_small.jpg

Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer"

Alphecca gets noticed!
Check out these
GLOWING REVIEWS
I've just made up:

"Sparkles like pewter"
-- Collector's World

"Wonderful, terrific, splendid"
-- Roget's Thesaurus

"Really good"
-- Stereo World, Gun World,
Car World, Travel World,
Computer World, Roger Ebert,
Martha Stewart, Barney, etc...

"I am not an idiut"
--Barbra Streisand



Proud to be an American
US Flag
standing with Israel
Flag of Israel

PageSpinner

...but all errors and sloppy code should be blamed on me...

All non-credited writings
and photos on
Alphecca.com are
(C) Copyright
2002-2008
by Jeff Soyer
All rights reserved.



July 08, 2006

Rudy For Pres? No Thanks.

The latest buzz about seems to be that Rudy Giuliani will make a bid for the GOP nomination for president. That's nice and certainly there are qualities I admire about him. He's a tough law-and-order guy, fiscally conservative, socially liberal. I can live with all that. What I can't live with is a president who is totally committed to gun control. He does not support in any way, shape, or form the right to keep and bear arms.

Now, it seems many think that he can get around the issue of gun control. A perfect example comes from Gay Patriot:


Rudy has been doing the right things to woo these [red state conservative] people, campaigning for social conservative candidates, even in the “reddest” areas of the “red states.” As the 2008 campaign approaches, he’ll need to find a way to finesse his liberal stands on social issues. On gun control and abortion, it should be relatively easy. He can say that gun control is an issue for the states...

Just one little problem. Groups such as the Bradys and VPC and the UN don't want gun control to be a state issue. They want it to be a national legislative issue. So do the likes of Di-Fi, Bloomberg, Kennedy, Schumer, Boxer, et al. So when a bill comes fresh through congress -- oh heck, let's say a new "Assault Weapons Ban" -- is Rudy going to veto it because it's an issue that should be decided by each state seperately?

You know got-damn well he'll have his pen out in a flash to sign it into law.

Sorry but all rights spring from the 2nd and I don't trust Giuliani to protect that one at all.

Posted by Jeff Soyer at July 8, 2006 03:08 PM
Comments

I'm torn on this one.

If Rudy gets the nomination, the Democrats better put someone pro-Gun up. Otherwise I'm going to have to choose between a half-dozen third parties, or taking my chances with Rudy, whom I really admire.

jp

Posted by: JP at July 8, 2006 05:22 PM

Invite Rudy to the range, see if you can change his mind.

Posted by: Donna B. at July 9, 2006 10:22 AM

my gut says he won't make it through the primary. he's got alot of baggage that's been pretty polished by his post 9/11 persona but he is at heart, a statist. and you can't polish a statist turd...

Posted by: dave at July 9, 2006 03:56 PM

As always Jeff you hit the nail on the head. Watched him for years and knew well he was anti-gun. He will sign are gun rights away. He is not to be trusted. Hillary and Rudy on gun issues are as one. That is a sad commentary on Rudy. Greatness must be judge on he that protect our God given rights! I will not vote for him. Keep up the good work.

Posted by: ranger nick at July 9, 2006 08:48 PM

Donna B.

Rudy is one of the many antis that fully understands the Second Amendment. The problem is that he wants to be one of the elite that gets to rule over us peons and he can't do that if we're armed.

Posted by: KCSteve at July 10, 2006 01:51 PM

Being in favor of gun control is not really a liberal position. Liberal values dictate that the most vulnerable members of a society deserve protection, including elderly people, handicapped people, women and low-income people forced to live in dangerous neighborhoods. The right to possess firearms is the only real chance that a 100 pound woman living in a bad neighborhood has against gangs of much larger, strogner males who police have not been able to eliminate despite decades of anti-gang efforts.

It's not the 200 pound man who makes $200k a year and lives in a gated neighborhood who benefits the most from the 2nd amendment. It's the most vulnerable people in our society who had no choice throughout history except to be victims before the advent of access to firearms. Every other weapon depends in some way on superior strength or other traits that these vulnerable people just aren't blessed with. Without access to guns, only the strong survive. That is the antithesis of liberal philosophy.

Start pointing this out to liberals rather than insisting that their stance on guns is crucial to their political identity (it isn't) and you'll win a lot more hearts and minds.

Remember that Sarah Brady is a life-long Republican and that Ronald Reagan gave several speeches heartily endorsing the assault weapons ban. Rudy Giuliani illustrates the reality of the divide perfectly. Demand for gun control comes from people in cities and suburbs who did not grow up with hunting and the responsible handling of firearms as a part of their lives. It has nothing to do with conservatism or liberalism. They fear what they don't understand just like people who grow up in rural areas where there are few open homosexuals fear gay people. They don't understand it so explain it to them. These are smart people who are capable of seeing sense if only second amendment rights supporters will explain it to them politely and without trying to drag a bunch of other right-wing political issues into the matter.

Posted by: Jack at July 12, 2006 10:48 AM
Note: Comments close down on posts after seven days and then
the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that.

By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...



Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah.
See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips.