|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
June 21, 2006Let the Voters Decide?After Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano vetoed a bill a while back that would have prevented police or state government from ever confiscating legally owned firearms during an emergency, law makers started to scheme. From the Arizona Daily Star:
Their hearts are in the right place but this could well back-fire. There is a large new population of "coastal types" who have moved to Arizona to escape the cold, congestion, whatever, who do not share the respect of unmitigated gun rights. While I won't say that it's as bad as -- for instance -- San Francisco, there could be trouble actually getting a majority to approve such a measure. A better way would have been to go for a veto-proof majority in the state legislature. It would only have taken another couple votes from what I understand. Go to work on those few Democrats who betrayed the original bill during the final vote. Comments
In order to remove live ammunition from the path of a fire, the Governor would have to have knowledge of the location of live ammunition. Registration and database of ammo buyers? And who would do the removal? Would they have court-issued warrants to enter those locations or would the Governor's "emergency order" be enough? Then removal to where? With receipt issued to the true owner, how? And identification of the removed property for later restoration, how? Nope. Sounds like the Gov wants to reserve the right to pull a "New Orleans" seizure. I personally hope that the bill that is being worked on includes a penalty section that includes words to the effect that "violation will immediately and self-evidently be proof of treason against the state and the people of the state and the Governor shall, without furthur delay, be moved to the end of a short rope attached to a limb on a tall tree". Posted by: homebru at June 21, 2006 01:57 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |