|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
June 08, 2006Gun Rights in Florida AdvanceGovernor Jeb Bush signed into law several pro-firearms bills. From the Sun-Sentinel:
The bill preventing authorities from seizing legally owned guns during an emergency is a true civil rights victory. We all saw what happened in New Orleans last year. Update: In NOLA, it could still happen again! One sour note; on reading the bill, the legislation DOES permit the governor to suspend sales of firearms during an emergency. So be good scouts down there and prepare ahead of time... I like the privacy of gun permit records bill, too. The media doesn't "need" to know who owns what and when they publish such lists, as papers in Ohio recently did, it gave criminals a roadmap of homes to burglarize while the owners are away. Want to see some real media bias? Here's how the Palm Beach Post reported it:
Ummm, Ms Petersen? What oversight, exactly, should the media have over CCW permit holders? The measure was passed specifically to prevent anti-gun media from publishing lists of all who have these permits, as the television station did. Interesting that that same station didn't publish the names of those with driver's licenses or fishing licenses. Just concealed-carry permits. Did somebody say media bias? Intimidation or harrassment? Trying to create a stigma? Attempting to advance their anti-gun agenda? Back to the Palm Beach Post: Notice how they try to demonize the NRA and characterize them as "one of the most powerful lobbies in the nation"? Would media ever make similar implications about the NEA or AARP or the American Trial Lawyers in a news story? Comments
I'm glad this passed but, hey, I want the whole world to know I'm packin'. I might get a big sign and put it up in my front yard: ARMED HOMEOWNER! Great news! Posted by: Tom Bowler at June 8, 2006 10:22 AMI wonder if you could publish Barbara Petersen's name and address. It isn't sensitive information, after all. Posted by: Malvolio at June 8, 2006 10:38 AMI don't much like that provisions to suspend firearms sales, but truth be told I also don't much like scenes of people with little or no firearms familiarity rushing out to buy guns. I'd still probably choose freedom over asthetics, though. Posted by: Tom at June 8, 2006 11:23 AMHiow about publishing all the names of those obtaining abortions with public funds, I mean we have a right to know how and who is spending our money, right? And what about rich people, shouldn't we publish the names of all those who have net worths of more than say 10 million? We have the right to know who these folks are that have their unfair share of the wealth. Think that is crazy? Think again, one could argue that the rich folks are taxpayers, and hence a major source of funding. Some oversight must be necessary to insure that they pay their fair share. Now we could watch their house to make sure they haven't made any large cash purchases. It is the old camel's nose in the tent argument--once the gov't gets it nose into anything, it justifies intrusions everywhere else (think healthcare as a basis for seatbelt and helmet laws, conditioning federal funding[which by the way comes from individual taxpayers in the states in the first place]on increased drinking age. Posted by: Ron at June 8, 2006 11:25 AMHow about the 800 pound gorilla - people who are known to be HIV positive. The wrong kind of contact with these people will kill you. Don't we all have a "right to know" so we can protect ourselves? Posted by: wrangler5 at June 8, 2006 12:09 PMRE: HB 285 - the text of the bill seems to state that, during a declared emergency, one may not carry one's firearm, even with a valid concealed weapon permit "in a public place." That's when a gun might most be needed. Am I reading that correctly, or am I missing something ? Posted by: Homer at June 8, 2006 12:21 PMGreat news! And good comments on the media's reaction. But, since when is the NEA one of the most powerful lobbies in the nation? Posted by: Shelby at June 8, 2006 12:24 PMThe article by the Palm Beach paper reminded be of a joke told by T Bubba Bechtol at the NRA banquet. He said he lives in "South" Florida, which is in the north part of the state. The interesting thing about Florida is that the further south you go, the further "north" you are. By the time you are down to Palm Beach, you are in New York. Posted by: Yosemite Sam at June 8, 2006 01:04 PM"I think this exemption makes a mockery of the constitutional right of access," said Petersen, president of the Florida First Amendment Foundation. ?????? explain please. Posted by: desertman at June 8, 2006 01:08 PMRon- This is off topic, of course, but where are people obtaining abortions w/ public funds? This has prompted me to check out the laws in my state re concealed weapons permits. Posted by: Pat at June 8, 2006 01:51 PMPat, Do you not think that the poor don't get them? Who pays? Check out this site http://www.aclu.org/reproductiverights/lowincome/12516res20040721.html Gotta love the internet Posted by: Ron at June 8, 2006 02:00 PMI loved the law about handing out voter registration forms with gun permit applications. After decades of "motor voter" laws, we finally get a little sardony. Posted by: Whitehall at June 8, 2006 03:28 PM"constitutional right of access" Umm...which part of the Constiution mentions that one again? All I can do is shake my head... Posted by: Tom at June 9, 2006 10:33 AMit amazes me that we can kill children because of privacy, but the people that advocate that don't respect privacy anywhere else. Something is really fucked up. Posted by: straightarrow at June 9, 2006 07:40 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |