|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
March 25, 2006Bush Sr. on Gun ControlCBS radio interviewed George H W Bush a couple days ago, reminiscing about the attempt on Ronald Reagain's life 25 years ago. While he's still rather -- inarticulate -- in some ways (like son like father) the interview by Peter Maer did contain this quote:
Is he for or against registration? He's not an advocate for more gun control but praises Sarah Brady. Just what the heck IS he saying here? Anyway, it caught my eye. Maybe you can figure it out... Posted by Jeff Soyer at March 25, 2006 07:49 AM Comments
I don't know if he praised her. Sounded more to me like he acknowledged the fact of her and tried to show he understood the emotional, in not rational reasons she has done what she's done. If he had praised her, would he not most probably agree with her? I mean to say, that if he believes his own postion to be rational, and it seems certain he does, without a direct statement to the contrary, he must believe her view is irrational. I think he may have been trying to appear empathetic without endorsing her. It is hard to tell, though, as he is pretty weak in his support for 2A. So, I could definitely be wrong, Naaah, what're the odds of that? Posted by: straightarrow at March 25, 2006 10:11 AMMost of us (well I do anyway) spend our lives trying to look smart and keep getting caught out as dumb. Daddy Bush seems to manage to do the oposite. Talk about being all things to all people..... How about a game of bullshit? At a political or business meeting you cross the words off as you hear them and the first one with a full horizontal, vertical or diagonal line jumps up, holding card aloft and shouts; "BULLSHIT" as loud as they can. Posted by: Keith at March 25, 2006 11:30 AMOk, Keith, you got me.:) Posted by: straightarrow at March 25, 2006 07:00 PMI'm not sure whether Senior was praising Sarah Brady or not. We could chalk his confusing-ness up to the fact that he's getting up there in years, but then again, he talked like that when he was President. Posted by: Lori Heine at March 25, 2006 09:12 PMHe's a classic NE republican ... if he ran for office in WY or AK, the democrats there wouldn't nominate him, since he is too far to the left to get WY or AK democrats to vote for him. In his home state, hr fits right in with the local republicans. He probably really believes that the purpose of the gun lobby is to support hunters ... Posted by: Kristopher at March 25, 2006 10:29 PMSeems to me that the "suckers" comment meant he understood that only the law-abiding will abide by the law. Perhaps he understands that when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have them. As for his comments on Ms. Brady, I wonder if he worked closely with Mr. Brady? And I wonder how much contact he had with her and the Brady familiy after the shooting. Just a thought. Posted by: JP at March 26, 2006 12:03 AMJP, Yes, he worked closely with and knew Jim Brady well before the shooting. I didn't see this as praising brady's efforts to eliminate guns. . . its pretty clear with his sucker comment what he things of gun control . . . rather I think he was expressing his understanding of why she feels the way she does as well as an appreciation for the success she has had in creating a huge organization (like her or not, its no easy thing to turn a small idea into such a big money maker and political hot topic). The man never could put a sentence together. It is really no surprise that he lost to Slick Willie. I still remember what he said when the Berlin Wall came down - THE most important day in the Cold War after the Cuban Missle Crisis. He said, "We'll have to see what happens." Posted by: Zendo Deb at March 26, 2006 07:49 PMHe's the classic rich-boy statist. Push him hard enough on it, and he'll say (in round-about PC-speak, of course) that there are "some people" out there who should be disarmed... meaning, in the immortal words of Leon Helmley, the "little people". email is human readable - aloud Posted by: bud at March 27, 2006 11:30 AMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |