|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
February 23, 2006FL: No Guns in Cars at WorkLooks as though property rights wins out over 2nd Amendment rights for now. From the Florida Sun-Sentinel:
As I've indicated in the past, there are arguments to be made either way. I have to wonder though, how a business would even know someone has a gun in the glove box or in the trunk unless they blab about it or are indiscrete in front of parking lot TV cameras? Well, short of getting everyone in the country to actually honor all parts of The Constitution, I suppose that just as is the case that if you don't like a particular state's gun control laws; move. So, if you don't like the policies of a company you work for; find employment elsewhere. I know that's easy to say and is trumped by the need to put food on the table... Comments
I tried to answer the question about how they would know, then lost the connection. Managed to save what I had written to email you, and lost that. Anyway, I finally emailed you the answer in one instance, but from a different address and it is an attachment. So don't be suspicious of it, I did use an identifier in the title. Would have posted it here if I could have. Now, of course it is working. I think my IP was having issues this am. Hope it helps. Share it if you like. Posted by: straightarrow at February 23, 2006 04:31 PMAt our little Mass. real estate office,the policy is " please carry ". A gun out in the car is worthless in time of need. Of course, we are all NRA and GOAL members. Jack Posted by: Jack Lorenz at February 24, 2006 08:53 AMI work for a large company with an armed security force. There are signs at the gates declaring a prohibition of firearms on company property, including personal vehicles in parking lots. It further states that personal vehicles are subject to search. I've never heard of anyone having their car searched. If someone were caught stealing, I wouldn't be supprised if their car were searched in the process of walking them out the door. But what should I do if someone were to break into my car and steal my hypothetical gun? If I report such, I risk getting fired. If I don't, I not only don't get my property back if it's recovered, but I put police and other security forces at risk. It's fair to suppose that the policy is meant to make the workplace safer and more secure. In fact, it has the opposite effect. By disarming law abiding employees, you reduce their ability to protect themselves and help in times of trouble. The security measures in place do nothing to prevent an employee intent on causing trouble from doing so. I respect the right of property owners to set the rules of behavior, but I believe they're making a mistake. Posted by: Aaron at February 24, 2006 02:20 PMAaron - We Don't have to worry about this here in Mass. The liberals have simplified our lives by not allowing firearms left unattended in vehicles. They also make it difficult to carry them. That must be why we don't have any crime here. You guys living in America just need to catch up! Jack Posted by: Jack Lorenz at February 24, 2006 02:36 PM'As I've indicated in the past, there are arguments to be made either way.' I disagree. The only property right issue I can see is that your car is your property and what lawful items you keep in it are no one's business. Posted by: SayUncle at February 26, 2006 11:26 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |