|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
February 16, 2006Twice As Many Reps Own Guns As DemsA rather obvious statistic. From Editor & Publisher:
I would have thought that a larger percentage of Democrats would use them for hunting simply because they (usually) don't believe in them for self-defense or such. That means that one-in-five Dems owns a firearm. One fifth of Democrats vote against their own 2nd Amendment rights. Granted they probably live in rural areas and their local or state representatives are good on gun rights but why are they supporting folks like Kerry and Clinton at the national level? Comments
If I see one more article that wantonly mixes percentages and fractions I'm going to... Well, nothing actually. It just drives me nuts. I agree, not terribly surprising. Posted by: Tom at February 16, 2006 04:06 PMThe study is BS. If someone calls you and wishes Why? Did you say "Why?" Because maybe they feel unworthy and unable to make a decision not approved by someone they consider smarter, stronger, morally superior, and nurturing? Oh wait, I just described my Australian Blue Heeler. Well, come to think of it the behavior is the same, isn't it? Posted by: straightarrow at February 16, 2006 06:35 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |