Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right"
--Guardian (UK) 6/26/06

*******************


Yeah, so?


Even my cats
have guns!

serbu_sidebar_125.jpg
Me with Serbu BFG-50

Email me at:
gunnut -at-
alphecca -dot- com

Check it out:

My group sci-fi blog novel:

Colony: Alchibah






Featured in
Outdoor Life Magazine:

outdoor_small.jpg

Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer"

Alphecca gets noticed!
Check out these
GLOWING REVIEWS
I've just made up:

"Sparkles like pewter"
-- Collector's World

"Wonderful, terrific, splendid"
-- Roget's Thesaurus

"Really good"
-- Stereo World, Gun World,
Car World, Travel World,
Computer World, Roger Ebert,
Martha Stewart, Barney, etc...

"I am not an idiut"
--Barbra Streisand



Proud to be an American
US Flag
standing with Israel
Flag of Israel

PageSpinner

...but all errors and sloppy code should be blamed on me...

All non-credited writings
and photos on
Alphecca.com are
(C) Copyright
2002-2008
by Jeff Soyer
All rights reserved.



February 13, 2006

Video Games & Guns

An editorial today in Arbiter Online (Boise State College) states that video game and TV violence doesn't cause kids to go out and kill people but the presence of guns does:


I don’t believe America really wants to take the necessary action to stop violence and death. In one year Japan had 15 people murdered by handguns. New Zealand had 2 people killed and the United States had 9,390 deaths caused by handguns. It’s too easy to find the gun closet in many homes.

The number one thing we could do is enforcing stricter gun laws, but Americans will never give up their handguns. Stricter gun laws would solve more problems than a boycott of video games.

This is the real problem, not the things of graphic nature shown on TV and video games. Has TV caused you to act violently? I believe most of us will answer no. Then how can we think TV causes everyone else to act violently?


I'm not going to discuss violence in the media because frankly, that's a First Amendment issue and I support the First Amendment completely.

I will attack the writer's solution. To compare murder rates in New Zealand or Japan with those in the US is nonsense because both of those societies are far more homogeneous than the US. The US has open and porous borders that have allowed innumberable elements to enter it as well as a much larger underclass. Yes, there is a difference in culture. By the way, Japan's suicide rate is higher than in the US -- again, a cultural thing. The population of the US is huge compared to NZ and Japan.

I'm tempted to laugh, though, because the writer hasn't done his homework: The rate of violence in New Zealand is double that of the US and New Zealand also has the highest rate of sexual assaut according to a United Nations study of 21 industrialized nations.

The writer says that the presence of TV hasn't caused most people to go out and commit violence. There are 80 million handgun owners in the US and the presence of those guns have not caused most of them or their children to run into the streets and commit violence either. It isn't the gun, it's the criminal. It isn't the kid, it's the neglected or unsupervised kid.

Posted by Jeff Soyer at February 13, 2006 07:04 AM
Comments

The other problem with the comparison is an artificial construct. If you restrict method A, deaths by method A will go down. ie, Japan has a very low suicide by gun rate, but a very high rate of suicide overall. Suicide is associated with depression, etc, not with a particular method of modus exitus....

Posted by: 4F at February 13, 2006 08:36 AM

The way statistics are gathered is different too. If someone in Japan kills his entire family and them him or herself all the deaths are considered suicide (they have name for it--essentially a family suicide). In the U.S. it's 'N' murders and one suicide. Other countries don't consider it a murder until someone is convicted of the crime rather than as in the U.S. where it is declared a probable murder after the medical examiner signs off on the cause of death. And finally the gun grabbers almost alway include the legal shooting deaths, including those by the police and I presume firing squads, amoung the "gun deaths". In other words in their minds there are no justified, let along praiseworthy, homicides.

Posted by: Joe Huffman at February 13, 2006 11:13 AM

Huh?

"Has a gun caused you to act violently? I believe most of us will answer no. Then how can we think a gun causes everyone else to act violently?"

Posted by: John Anderson at February 13, 2006 11:17 AM

Given the stats on who, demographically, commits the most handgun murders, we could also lower our rate significantly by kicking out all the African-American males between the ages of 16 and 30, because that's who commits the majority of murders (and other violent crimes) in the US. But you won't hear any media types talking about that stat.

BTW Joe, Utah last I checked was the only state that still allowed for the death sentence to be carried out by firing squad, but they haven't actually had one for many years.

Posted by: Heartless Libertarian at February 13, 2006 12:05 PM

and....yes, we enjoy freedoms here that cannot be found on any other place on earth. Why not compare our crime rate to that of oh, say, Singapore? Sounds good statisticaly if you don't mind living in a police state.

There is some statistical study (lies, statistics, they are all the same) that shows the increase in crime as television sets became more prevalent in the American home. A similar increase was seen in Canada lagging by like 5-10 years, as Canadian household caught up with the US in televisions per household. Interesting correlation.

Posted by: Ron at February 13, 2006 12:31 PM

There may be another factor affecting Japan's murder rate: the conviction rate for all crimes is, if I remember correctly, somewhere above 90%. Anyone have any details, especially as compared to the US?

Posted by: OldeForce at February 13, 2006 06:44 PM

A few years ago, at a law enforcement conference featuring Dave Grossman, the author of "On Killing" and one of the leading trainers of our special forces in the area of combat psychology, I learned something interesting. Somewhere in Canada at a group home for violent teen boys, they conducted a study during which they removed all violent electronic media: television; games; all of it. Nothing else was changed.

The result? Violent acts committed by the boys were reduced by over 90 percent. It seems that outside influences provided by entertainment can surely have an effect on those who are predisposed to that sort of thing in the first place.

Food for thought. And no, I would never support speech restrictions.

Posted by: Carey at February 13, 2006 07:04 PM

We all know that the answer to the crime problem is locking up the criminals and not letting them back out on the streets b/c of the recidivism rate. Simple, but not practical since 1) punishment is only meted out to fit the crime at hand and 2) people in general always hope that someone can be rehabilitated.

Posted by: Ron at February 13, 2006 07:41 PM

ur a twat

Posted by: jhmg at February 21, 2006 09:54 AM
Note: Comments close down on posts after seven days and then
the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that.

By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...



Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah.
See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips.