|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
January 27, 2006Smart Editorial & Smart Cop
It's not the thugs who will turn in their guns. Gather the resources to fight crime, not law abiding citizens who own guns. Posted by Jeff Soyer at January 27, 2006 07:49 AM Comments
Wow, they actually figured it out, and admitted it. I always thought that if gun buy back programs were the answer, how about crack buy back program? Posted by: Rey at January 27, 2006 09:10 AMChief Cliff announces his 'retirement' in 4, 3, 2, 1,... Posted by: tomWright at January 27, 2006 09:37 AM Why do we still use the anti gun phrase "gun buyback" ? Dennis I remember hearing about a program in Detroit, many years ago, when they faced a rash of carjackings. Mayor, Police Chief and District Attorney supposedly held a press conference to announce a new program under which armed, plainclothes cops would cruise likely crime areas and, if a carjacking was attempted all perpetrators would be shot, as many times and in whatever places it took to insure that they were dead. "There will be no trials" was the motto. Carjackings reportedly dropped dramatically, overnight. Think that's what Saginaw's Safe Streets teams are doing? If not, why not? Posted by: wrangler5 at January 27, 2006 06:42 PMA couple of years ago, a local TV station (Toledo, OH, channel 24) had a news story on "gun buy-back" that began: "Well, tonight, Toledo is a bit safer due to a number of guns being taken off the streets in a buy back program" (or words very close to that) The bit ended with "we'll bring you more news when there's another buy back next Saturday" It took me about 2 minutes with Google (on a DIALUP connection, no less) to find a study or 2, sources on a .edu site, NOT the NRA, that put the lie to the "safer streets" claim. I wrote to the news director, pointed him to the .edu site, and I don't think there was a report the following Saturday. Will write an email outlining a previous encounter with that station's biased gun reporting. Posted by: jdunmyer at January 28, 2006 12:53 PMWhen Chicago undertook such a program, there was a rash of gun robberies. The city knew in at least one case that they had "bought back" a stolen gun, an historic black powder Colt SAA worth many times what they paid for it, and as far as I know refused to return it to the rightful owner. My son had friends of friends on the fringes of the street gangs, and reported that the program was also used to dispose of evidence guns from shootings. Posted by: triticale at January 28, 2006 08:56 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |