|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
December 09, 2005But There's No Slippery Slope...First they registered our guns. Then they banned some of them. Now, as you've read, some in Canada want to ban all handguns:
Well of course! If they ban all handguns then there won't be any, right? Nobody will smuggle one in or refuse to turn theirs in because that would be illegal, right?
I'll tell you what: They try that shit here in the US and I'll be first to sign-up for the civil war that results. But wait! Even the gun grabbers say it isn't the guns:
In otherwords, it's the gangs, stupid, not the guns themselves! But going after the gangs is, uh, dangerous, so let's just ban all handguns and the problem will take care of itself. Yeah, right. Posted by Jeff Soyer at December 9, 2005 04:41 PM Comments
IF as part of a handgun ban they also included in the law that (1) anyone caught with a handgun by the police will be killed with it on the spot, (2) the policeman who fires the shot will receive a cash reward, (3) the survivors of the deceased will be charged for his cleanup and funeral expenses, and (4) any plaintiff and all of his attorneys of record who file a lawsuit seeking damages against any party for an improper shooting under (1) above and lose that lawsuit will be killed on the spot, and IF the government did all of these things without fail in every case (including to politicians and children caught with handguns) for five years, THEN I might believe that the politicians are really interested in getting guns off the streets. Otherwise it's just a move by those in power to disarm the sheepdogs and deserves to be resisted with all available force. If the politicians who promote this sort of nonsense really believe it will reduce the incident of violence then they are too stupid to be allowed to vote, let alone hold office, and should be resisted with all available force. Good thing I'm not a Canadian, 'cause I hear it's hard to get into the US these days. Posted by: wrangler5 at December 9, 2005 05:53 PMWe should welcome any provinces that wish to secede into the Union. Except Quebec and Ontario. That's where the Frenchies and libs live. Posted by: Heartless Libertarian at December 9, 2005 06:16 PMActually this seems eminently reasonable if you take the viewpoint of a Canadian Liberal Politician. Come on, we're talking about a corrupt, arrogant, abusive banana republic oligarchy that is facing the prospect of not holding power next year. Say you're one of these goons and you see the likelihood that you'll be on the street, among the peasants and peons, without RCMP protection. Wouldn't you suddenly want to ensure you'd be entering an unarmed populace? What we in the US need to do is dispatch Jimmy Carter to negotitate some sort of power sharing arrangement. Or maybe the Libs can pick up the lease on Arafat's Riviera villa. Posted by: Steve Skubinna at December 9, 2005 06:52 PMI thought Canadians didn't have guns, that they were so much more enlightened and civilized than us.... Posted by: Dean Esmay at December 9, 2005 10:11 PMI'm with you Jeff. And in light of the recent news I'm giving Canadians showing up a Boomershoot 2006 a rebate. Posted by: Joe Huffman at December 10, 2005 04:35 PMSteve: it's an election promise, so the Liberals are only going to enact it if they get reelected (which, of course, they will, because politics in Canada is a joke). Posted by: Adam at December 10, 2005 10:45 PMAdam, I agree that the Libs will probably stay in power. We are talking about Canada, of course. But I am curious why the police get an exemption. If nobody has guns, then why should the cops? Posted by: Steve Skubinna at December 11, 2005 07:51 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |