|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
October 28, 2005Ill: Uniform Firearms Transport Law in Works
This is just common sense legislation. You live in or want to visit Illinois to go hunting or to a range outing. Trying to figure out a route that will bypass towns with "no firearms" rules, or that prohibit firearms in your trunk is near impossible. Chicago comes to mind. This bill would rectify that. It's passed the Senate and goes to the House. Posted by Jeff Soyer at October 28, 2005 06:53 AM Comments
Correct me if this is wrong, but isn't this already federal law? Or does the federal regulation only protect you when traveling between states, and not for intra-state travel? Posted by: Bill Twist at October 28, 2005 11:08 AMBill, Why? Why in hell would any self respecting gun owner want to visit that Browning forsaken place, let alone live there? The bill would be an improvement over the existing state of affairs in that piece of land bordered by America, but considering the sheer magnitude & viciousness of the rest of the gun contorl laws there it's less than putting a band aid on someone who was decapitated. Did the article mention that possession of guns or ammo w/o an FOID is an arrestable offense? The ban on NFA items? The prohibition on carry outside the home be it concealed or open unless hunting, target shooting or the firearm is unloaded & locked up? I could check the article for myself but i just don't feel up for hearing more about that bloody place than I have to. The only common sense legislation that should occur in that state is altering their RKBA provision to omit "...subject to the police power..." & then adjust (i.e. eliminate) all their gun control laws accordingly. The only common sense action for gun owners is to avoid the damned place at all costs. Posted by: Publicola at October 28, 2005 09:30 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |