|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
October 28, 2005So It Wasn't Smith & Wesson!Just Smith himself! Jason D. Smith, to be exact. See, if you read Tuesday's Report here you learned that Canada is thinking of suing American gun companies:
As if the gunmaker is supposed to personally keep track of every firearm they send to distributors. Turns out, it isn't their fault but the fault of people who steal or rob or who knows what. From the Seattle PI:
So perhaps Canada should sue this guy Smith instead. Oh yeah, criminals generally don't have much money. Incidentally, not to defend Smith but I'm generally against entrapment as a law tool. It just rubs me the wrong way. Posted by Jeff Soyer at October 28, 2005 06:16 AM Comments
Not to get ahead of ourselves, but just how exactly does the Canadian Government plan on doing this? In US courts? nope, the Lawful Commerce in Arms Act prevents that. In Canadian Courts? If it is illegal to purchase guns in the great frozen north, that means that they don't have distributors there right? How can you sue a company that does no business in your country and it is illegal to sue them in thier home country? Sorry, I don't see how the mechanics of this would work. Sure, Sue them, they won't show up, the canadians will win by default, but how will they collect? Or is it all about winning some kind of "moral" victory? Posted by: Rorschach at October 28, 2005 02:37 PMFirst, it is not illegal to buy guns in Canada. You just need to register them. Which I disagree with. Sounds like what the gun makers should do is move out of Canada and go where they are appreciated. Posted by: Robert Garrard at October 28, 2005 07:00 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |