|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
October 07, 2005Free Gun Locks a Sham?That's the impression the gun grabbers give from reading this USA Today story:
But now we get to the real agenda of the gun grabbers:
I.E., all guns must be banned from any home with children. That would be half the country, at least. Then, of course, since the remaining people's homes could be visited by kids, or burglars could break-in and steal any guns, they would have to give up their firearms, too. Doing these simple things would make the world, or at least the U.S. safe. After all, then only the criminals would have guns. Posted by Jeff Soyer at October 7, 2005 08:46 AM Comments
Even the best child safety lock program is only going to prevent a very few deaths among very young children. I agree completely...because there are so few deaths among very young children in the first place!! It's awful hard to effect a huge decrease in something that barely happens in the first place. Do we need to use smaller syllables to make the gun grabbers understand? I'm at a loss. Maybe I'll just keep (relatively) quite and wait for the day something really bad goes down and then see who goes running for mommy (government) and who stands up with the will and the means to deal with bad guys on the loose a la NOLA. Posted by: Tom at October 7, 2005 03:30 PMDrat, Tom beat me to it. He could afford a handgun but he couldn't afford a simple pistol box to lock it up in when he wasn't using it? Those free gun locks are garbage. I had one once, never used it on a gun. When I did try to use it for a non-gun-related purpose, it fell apart the first time I tried to use it. Garbage. Posted by: AlanDP at October 7, 2005 06:39 PMWhatever happened to the word "no"as in, "No, you don't touch these things that belong to Daddy!". My kid knew the mean of no when she was about two. Posted by: emdfl at October 8, 2005 12:17 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |