|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
July 31, 2005If Things Look Strange...I'm messing around with the look of Alphecca. Expect some weirdness today... My goal is to make Alphecca more readable and clean, and also to freshen it up a bit. Many readers have complained (especially those using LCD screens) that the light-gray text on a black background is hard to read. I also think it's gotten a bit "gloomy" and to that end, what you are seeing now is how I learn my way around CSS. Some colors will change because I have to go into the main template besides just the style sheet. Your comments are most welcome. By the end of Sunday I should have it the way I want it. If worse comes to worse, I can always plug my old style sheet back in... Update 6:30 pm: We have several choices here on my color scheme but mostly I think we're arguing over the top-photo. Let's call it the "topper". I will present the choices here now and you can all indicate in the comments as to which you prefer. In a perfect world where I'm a real geek and can program cool stuff, I'd let you choose your own look much like my friends at On The Third Hand. OR, I could do something nifty like my new friends at ARGGHHH! do, where the topper changes every time you go there. Let me present you with your choices. I will not try to influence you in any way. I will be completely objective. Your first choice is the fresh, bright new look which speaks optimism, confidence, hopefulness, and happy, clean, wonderful cheerfulness that I'm trying to establish around here:
OR! You could choose to stay with the depressing, dark and gloomy, somber, melancholy, despondent, depressed, cheerless, glum, doleful, dispireted, heavy-hearted, morose, woebegone, dismal, dreary, grim, desolate, somber [quite the fucking thesaurus you've got there, Jeff! --ed][Yeah, it's the best on the market...--js], miserable, heartsick, disconsolate, morbid, funereal, mopy topper that several studies I've just made up claim are favored by manic-depressive people with tiny dicks... ![]() OR! Yes, freedom of choice around here. This was always Say Uncle's favorite topper:
Lastly, I suppose I could use the picture of porky:
So there are your choices. The comments are open. I hear and maybe, possibly, might obey... Update Monday: If you visit regularly and you're NOT seeing a difference since last Saturday, you might need to empty your cache, especially if using IE. Then reload the page... Comments
Jeff, it looks absolutely FABULOUS! Posted by: Jeff Soyer at July 31, 2005 02:27 PMI liked the old colors better. I think the new ones are a little too loud. Posted by: Ryland at July 31, 2005 02:43 PMThe text and all looks pretty good - though I don't really like the image across the top of the page - it looked fine with your previous colors, it just doesn't work now. Maybe you could keep your old title banner? Posted by: countertop at July 31, 2005 02:44 PMI, too, liked the old banner better, but I think the colors are just fine. I do prefer the original colors because white back rounds give me a headache if I stare at them for more than about 45 minutes, which is why I have a "blue-collar" job. Posted by: matt groom at July 31, 2005 04:26 PMI'd also vote for the old topper. Posted by: Kip at July 31, 2005 07:49 PMI vote for the boobies Posted by: Wonderkid at August 1, 2005 06:22 AMDitto on the breastage! Would also like the black background changed to something lighter with dark or black lettering. As someone else pointed out....just too gloomy! Sometimes I have to leave your sight and go buy another gun to cheer myself up! Guess thats not all bad either! Keep up the good work! Posted by: Paul at August 1, 2005 08:50 AMSay Uncle is a wise man, as is Wonderkid. I go with the breastseses! Posted by: Ken Summers at August 1, 2005 09:28 AMWell, since I apparantly have a bigger selection of banners to choose from than previously, I would like to change my earlier banner choice in favor of the boobies Posted by: countertop at August 1, 2005 09:35 AMThe old topper on the new colors would be nifty, I think. Posted by: Dave D at August 1, 2005 10:59 AMHey, Jeff! The new look is very nice. Keeps my bosses from suspecting anything. Posted by: Jason Hinds at August 1, 2005 12:54 PMI like the B&W text area. The boobies header would really keep the hoi polloi guessing as to WTF is this blog about? In general I like happy and colorful. But I scored fairly high on the hippie test - unlike most of my favorite gun/political bloggers who all seemed to have avoided a decade (or two) of fun. Keep up the good work! Posted by: Brent at August 1, 2005 05:17 PMI complained about the change the last time you tried it but I've gotten used to it from following links to individual posts. Jeff - I like it it looks zingy or something. Posted by: Marc at August 1, 2005 10:56 PMI like the brighter look. Thought I was in the wrong place for a moment. Posted by: Jim at August 7, 2005 07:55 AMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |