|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
July 29, 2005S397 Proposed AmendmentsDemocrats (and an occasional Republican) are flouncing around attempting to attach all sorts of amendments to Senate bill S397, the legislation that would protect gun makers and dealers from frivolous lawsuits resulting from the criminal misuse of their products. One requiring an external safety lock be sold with each new gun was passed. That's okay and hardly objectionable. Actually, most gun makers include such a lock now with their firearms. Some of the other proposed amendments are simply ludicrous. From the AP:
The amendments sponsored by Corzine and Lautenberg are absurd because either the firearm was misused or it wasn't. If the gun WAS misused, either criminally or by accident, then the gun maker or dealer shouldn't be held liable, same as with a car or kitchen knife, et al. Someone being a cop or kid doesn't suddenly change that equation and would simply result in piles of lawsuits being filed on behalf of cops and kids. And then there's Ted "the lifeguard" Kennedy, who wants to ban hollow-points. He likes to call them "cop killer" bullets but of course they're not. Again, it's not the bullet but how it's used and even a casual browsing of hunting forums shows that cast-hollow-points are very popular because they often (aside from shot placement, of course) help insure a one-shot kill in animals such as deer. Handgun hunting almost requires hollow-points. And yes, for personal defense, a hollow-point is preferable. Reed's amendment is just silly. So instead of gun manufacturers having to defend against 30 class action lawsuits, they would now have to defend against 3000 individual lawsuits? I don't expect any of these measures to pass, nor bans or extreme regulations on .50 caliber rifles, either. It must suck being a Democrat these days, heh. Comments
why do the Dems insist on making law after law? The laws won't change a thing, and will just add to the already overwhelmed Justice system problems. GUNS kill people, but at the hand of other PEOPLE. Just like cars for crissakes. LOL wouldn't hollow points be LESS likely to penetrate the polices body armor? I propose we rename them "cop SAVER bullets". Posted by: dave at July 29, 2005 09:12 AMI'm wondering why any of these amendments are being allowed in the first place. My understanding is there are rules that Frist could use to get a vote on the bill only, no amendments allowed. So why isn't he using it? Posted by: Mark at July 29, 2005 02:34 PMThe amendments to give a certain class of people (Policemen, Children, Etc) special and separate rights apart from the citizenry, under the law, is unconstitutional. That is what equal protection under the law means. This type of legislation has consistanly been overturned, Here in New York State, by the appellate courts. Posted by: Jim Glover at July 31, 2005 11:21 AMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |