Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right"
--Guardian (UK) 6/26/06

*******************


Yeah, so?


Even my cats
have guns!

serbu_sidebar_125.jpg
Me with Serbu BFG-50

Email me at:
gunnut -at-
alphecca -dot- com

Check it out:

My group sci-fi blog novel:

Colony: Alchibah






Featured in
Outdoor Life Magazine:

outdoor_small.jpg

Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer"

Alphecca gets noticed!
Check out these
GLOWING REVIEWS
I've just made up:

"Sparkles like pewter"
-- Collector's World

"Wonderful, terrific, splendid"
-- Roget's Thesaurus

"Really good"
-- Stereo World, Gun World,
Car World, Travel World,
Computer World, Roger Ebert,
Martha Stewart, Barney, etc...

"I am not an idiut"
--Barbra Streisand



Proud to be an American
US Flag
standing with Israel
Flag of Israel

PageSpinner

...but all errors and sloppy code should be blamed on me...

All non-credited writings
and photos on
Alphecca.com are
(C) Copyright
2002-2008
by Jeff Soyer
All rights reserved.



July 29, 2005

S397 Proposed Amendments

Democrats (and an occasional Republican) are flouncing around attempting to attach all sorts of amendments to Senate bill S397, the legislation that would protect gun makers and dealers from frivolous lawsuits resulting from the criminal misuse of their products. One requiring an external safety lock be sold with each new gun was passed. That's okay and hardly objectionable. Actually, most gun makers include such a lock now with their firearms.

Some of the other proposed amendments are simply ludicrous. From the AP:


Republican Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., agreed late Thursday to allow debate on amendments to the measure Friday. One, sponsored by Sen. Jon Corzine, D-N.J., would make police officers exceptions to the bill's restrictions, allowing them to sue. Another, sponsored by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., would do the same for children.

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., introduced an amendment that would ban hollow-tipped, "cop killer" bullets. Another, sponsored by Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., would allow individuals, but not municipalities, to file such lawsuits.


The amendments sponsored by Corzine and Lautenberg are absurd because either the firearm was misused or it wasn't. If the gun WAS misused, either criminally or by accident, then the gun maker or dealer shouldn't be held liable, same as with a car or kitchen knife, et al. Someone being a cop or kid doesn't suddenly change that equation and would simply result in piles of lawsuits being filed on behalf of cops and kids.

And then there's Ted "the lifeguard" Kennedy, who wants to ban hollow-points. He likes to call them "cop killer" bullets but of course they're not. Again, it's not the bullet but how it's used and even a casual browsing of hunting forums shows that cast-hollow-points are very popular because they often (aside from shot placement, of course) help insure a one-shot kill in animals such as deer. Handgun hunting almost requires hollow-points. And yes, for personal defense, a hollow-point is preferable.

Reed's amendment is just silly. So instead of gun manufacturers having to defend against 30 class action lawsuits, they would now have to defend against 3000 individual lawsuits?

I don't expect any of these measures to pass, nor bans or extreme regulations on .50 caliber rifles, either.

It must suck being a Democrat these days, heh.

Posted by Jeff Soyer at July 29, 2005 07:09 AM
Comments

why do the Dems insist on making law after law? The laws won't change a thing, and will just add to the already overwhelmed Justice system problems. GUNS kill people, but at the hand of other PEOPLE. Just like cars for crissakes. LOL
(It's not really funny but hey...)Teddy Kennedy sucks. Big time.

Posted by: Raven at July 29, 2005 08:33 AM

wouldn't hollow points be LESS likely to penetrate the polices body armor?

I propose we rename them "cop SAVER bullets".

Posted by: dave at July 29, 2005 09:12 AM

I'm wondering why any of these amendments are being allowed in the first place. My understanding is there are rules that Frist could use to get a vote on the bill only, no amendments allowed. So why isn't he using it?

Posted by: Mark at July 29, 2005 02:34 PM

The amendments to give a certain class of people (Policemen, Children, Etc) special and separate rights apart from the citizenry, under the law, is unconstitutional. That is what equal protection under the law means. This type of legislation has consistanly been overturned, Here in New York State, by the appellate courts.

Posted by: Jim Glover at July 31, 2005 11:21 AM
Note: Comments close down on posts after seven days and then
the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that.

By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...



Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah.
See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips.