|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
July 28, 2005CSM Wrong AgainThe Christian Science Monitor is wrong. They pretty much always are. I have to presume that their un-named editorial writer doesn't read or doesn't bother to even research a bill he is criticizing:
Okay, one more time for the photographers -- from the actual proposed legislation:
The DC Sniper victims' lawsuits against the Bull's Eye Shop COULD have proceeded under this new bill. Why is this concept so hard to understand by liberal newspaper writers? Or are they just ignoring it because it doesn't fit in with their anti-gun agenda? That was a rhetorical question... Posted by Jeff Soyer at July 28, 2005 07:44 AM Comments
Today's (spit) New York Times had a very nearly identical op-ed as well. If they're both upset about this bill, we must be doing something right. oh the link. Lying? Well, that's un-Christian and un-science. Posted by: SayUncle at July 28, 2005 09:34 AMIt's no surprise on the nearly identical op-ed/"news" stories. They are both parroting a Brady Center press release (see URL). http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=50943 MSM research a story? Understand an issue? Why, that takes effort! Posted by: Tom Frank at July 28, 2005 11:20 AMthat, and the lie that 200 guns mysteriously left Bullseye. Once again see here: Brian Borgelt The numbers jumped around wildly during the frenzy of media coverage that followed the sniper arrests in October 2002. The rumors said 340 guns were missing, then 262, then 238, then 160 and finally 78 – a number cited by the ATF. Posted by: ben at July 29, 2005 12:45 AM*grumble* I actually got a response from my House of Reps critter (Olver if it matters) to my request he vote for(!) the "Protection of..." act. Scumbag's response was right out of VPC literature. To paraphrase: This bill will prevent people from suing if they are REALLY injured. Bull. Sounds to me like he hasn't even bothered to read it. But our congress-critters are KNOWN for that. *spit* Peet in WMass... the comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |