Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right"
--Guardian (UK) 6/26/06

*******************


Yeah, so?


Even my cats
have guns!

serbu_sidebar_125.jpg
Me with Serbu BFG-50

Email me at:
gunnut -at-
alphecca -dot- com

Check it out:

My group sci-fi blog novel:

Colony: Alchibah






Featured in
Outdoor Life Magazine:

outdoor_small.jpg

Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer"

Alphecca gets noticed!
Check out these
GLOWING REVIEWS
I've just made up:

"Sparkles like pewter"
-- Collector's World

"Wonderful, terrific, splendid"
-- Roget's Thesaurus

"Really good"
-- Stereo World, Gun World,
Car World, Travel World,
Computer World, Roger Ebert,
Martha Stewart, Barney, etc...

"I am not an idiut"
--Barbra Streisand



Proud to be an American
US Flag
standing with Israel
Flag of Israel

PageSpinner

...but all errors and sloppy code should be blamed on me...

All non-credited writings
and photos on
Alphecca.com are
(C) Copyright
2002-2008
by Jeff Soyer
All rights reserved.



July 28, 2005

Dem's View: Guns Bad, Pedos' Good

Curious story -- actually two for one -- yesterday from the AP. It starts out with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist playing hardball with the bill to shield gun makers and dealers from most frivolous lawsuits:


Until lawmakers vote on a top-priority gun rights bill, nothing else happens in the Senate. And that includes Congress' prized monthlong vacation.

That's the way Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has toughened up his style in the final days before the August break was to begin, learning from last year to leave no room for gun control advocates to derail legislation limiting lawsuits against the gun industry.

Frist, R-Tenn., used Senate parliamentary procedures Wednesday to keep Democrats from dooming the measure with an amendment that would offend the National Rifle Association.


Reuters goes farther:

But critics said that the bill goes much further and would prevent action even against distributors who supply guns to criminals. They said it would halt lawsuits by policemen shot on the job or families who lost loved ones to the 2002 Washington-area snipers.

"The real effect of this bill would be to prevent victims of gun violence from pursuing even obviously valid claims in state or federal courts," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat.


So far so good. I like seeing the Democrats squeal. They're all in the hip-pocket of trial lawyers who are the ones behind almost all the frivolous lawsuits filed by many cities around the country.

But then, let's go back to the AP story for a moment because there was a "second part" to it dealing with sex offenders:


States would have to have uniform Web sites for registering sex offenders and establish new mandatory minimum prison sentences for crimes against children under a bill approved Wednesday by the House Judiciary Committee.

But majority Republicans barely beat back an effort by Democrats on the panel to delete a provision that would establish a minimum five-year prison sentence for convicted sex offenders who fail to register their whereabouts with authorities.

Democrats called the measure too harsh, saying it could apply to a person who had been convicted of a misdemeanor sex offense. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said a person could end up serving more time in prison for failing to report than for the actual crime committed. "That doesn't make any sense at all," he said.

However, Rep. Mark Green, R-Wis., said failing to register undermines a key weapon against sex offenders — knowledge of where they're residing. "It is, in my view, a very serious offense," he said.


So what we see here is a pattern of sorts. Democrats don't want to blame the perpetrator of gun crimes -- maybe because most don't have any money for lawyers to grab -- but would rather blame the maker of the firearm. They're saying, "It's not the criminal, it's the gun".

And proving that that is their logic, we see that they don't want to impose mandatory jail sentences for sex offenders who fail to register their whereabouts. Perhaps they would rather blame or file suit against the mattress company that was used in the original crime...

I'll tell you this much: Start looking for a rash of suits against beer and liquar companies. It isn't the drunk, it's the booze.

Posted by Jeff Soyer at July 28, 2005 07:26 AM
Comments

Why do just sex offenders have to register. Isn't murder worse? And how about them drug dealers and users. Home invaders. Robbers, thieves.

What ever happened to the publics right to know?

All criminals and former criminals need to register.

Or we could deal with all this honestly. Once you have paid for your crime the slate (except for repeat offences) is wiped clean.

How about making the penalty for child molesting harsher? If you think they need watching their whole life then life without parole it is.

Of course the harsher the sentence the more incentive to murder the victim or shoot it out with police.

There may be a simple answer. It is probably wrong. You are dealing with humans.

Posted by: M. Simon at August 1, 2005 12:46 AM
Note: Comments close down on posts after seven days and then
the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that.

By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...



Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah.
See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips.