|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
July 28, 2005Dem's View: Guns Bad, Pedos' GoodCurious story -- actually two for one -- yesterday from the AP. It starts out with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist playing hardball with the bill to shield gun makers and dealers from most frivolous lawsuits:
Reuters goes farther:
So far so good. I like seeing the Democrats squeal. They're all in the hip-pocket of trial lawyers who are the ones behind almost all the frivolous lawsuits filed by many cities around the country. But then, let's go back to the AP story for a moment because there was a "second part" to it dealing with sex offenders:
So what we see here is a pattern of sorts. Democrats don't want to blame the perpetrator of gun crimes -- maybe because most don't have any money for lawyers to grab -- but would rather blame the maker of the firearm. They're saying, "It's not the criminal, it's the gun". And proving that that is their logic, we see that they don't want to impose mandatory jail sentences for sex offenders who fail to register their whereabouts. Perhaps they would rather blame or file suit against the mattress company that was used in the original crime... I'll tell you this much: Start looking for a rash of suits against beer and liquar companies. It isn't the drunk, it's the booze. Comments
Why do just sex offenders have to register. Isn't murder worse? And how about them drug dealers and users. Home invaders. Robbers, thieves. What ever happened to the publics right to know? All criminals and former criminals need to register. Or we could deal with all this honestly. Once you have paid for your crime the slate (except for repeat offences) is wiped clean. How about making the penalty for child molesting harsher? If you think they need watching their whole life then life without parole it is. Of course the harsher the sentence the more incentive to murder the victim or shoot it out with police. There may be a simple answer. It is probably wrong. You are dealing with humans. Posted by: M. Simon at August 1, 2005 12:46 AMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |