|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
June 06, 2005Point or Aim?At the range, I've usually done my pistol shooting by aiming with the sights. More and more though, I've been practicing by pointing, instead. It just seems more logical that if I suddenly need to defend myself I might not have time to acquire the sights. I suppose I could attach a laser but that just complicates things in other ways. Any thoughts on this? Comments
I'm still trying to get good at the two-handed, one eye, use the sights, focus on the front blade and DON'T JERK THE GUN method! However, I agree with you on the sightless firing mode. I doubt said mutant will give me time to breath in and out slowly, hold and fire! Posted by: paul at June 6, 2005 08:49 AMPoint shooting is great inside a certain range. I think that range is different for each person. I prefer "Riding the front sight", which is basically using the front sight by itself when shooting inside 10 yards. This method relys on repetition of my presentation that makes it pretty consistant. Posted by: buck at June 6, 2005 09:08 AMJeff; There is a wholesale re-evaluation of what id called "point," or "index" shooting, led by such well-know firearms trainers as Walt Rauch, Michael Janich and Ralph Mroz. For the past 30-40 years the emphasis has been solely on aimed fire, despite the overwhelming evidence from police and civilian self-defense shootings that under stress, people don't — and don't need to — use the sights. I'm going to do an episode of SHOOTING GALLERY on the subject for the season that begins January 1. I've written a bunch about "not traiing against the operating system." By all means, practice point shooting,...it's just another tool in the arsenal... Michael Bane Posted by: Michael Bane at June 6, 2005 10:55 AMMost Tuesday nights we practice index shooting and aiming shots. Depending on the distance, I have learned to use the back of my pistol to index the target or just indexing the sights and putting steel to target. Eye dominance is the only thing that trips me up with using sights. Best of luck and keep practicing. Posted by: shooter at June 6, 2005 01:11 PM First of all, rejoice! You are extremely unlikely to ever have to engage a human being with a gun. The best defense, pistol advice I recieved was The best defense is to move to a better neighborhood! :) Posted by: Scott Ferguson at June 6, 2005 05:27 PMJeff, i'm currently havin this debate with a bunch of guys in Kim du Toit's Nation of Riflemen Forum. I'm a total n00b to guns, but I have a smattering of experience (i'm no expert tho, trust me) in martial arts. And it seems to me that a handgun could be more effective if used as any other wielded weapon... Vision-dominant shooting iwth a rifle makes sense, it's the only way to get it done for a lot of reasons....but with a handgun, proprioception (yoru body's ability to tell how its limbs are positioned) shoudl be plenty if you develop the muscle memory to have the gun parallel to the forum every time. Posted by: IndianCowboy at June 6, 2005 05:31 PMTry I am definitely not an expert so can't add much to what the other folks said, except that I would recommend the writings of Massad Ayoob in various gun magazines (here, for example), though I don't know if he specifically addresses point vs. aim. Posted by: Ken Summers at June 6, 2005 10:45 PMAt short distances, shooting for center-of-mass, minimal aiming is required. Not that you are doing quick draw. If you hold your favorite handgun in a 2-handed grip, just in front of your chest (arms NOT extended), the gun will point accurately to about 10 yards, maybe a bit less. Since the average gun fight is at about 10 feet, this is no problem. Posted by: Zendo Deb at June 8, 2005 09:02 AMMy take on it is that point shooting is effective at arms length, and not much more unless you put LOTS of practice into it. Incidentally, the opportunity to point shoot is already built into the proper draw stroke. It's available from the "rock and lock" phase up until you bring the gun to eye level, at which point you transition to aimed fire. If anything, most people are probably optimistic that they'll have the distance to target and time needed to get a complete draw stroke resulting in aimed fire, and accordingly should dry practice abreviated draw strokes ending in point fire more frequently than the full motion. Posted by: geekWithA.45 at June 8, 2005 11:13 AMThanks for the input, everybody. Posted by: Jeff Soyer at June 10, 2005 12:02 PMHip-shooting(or point-shooting) used to be the standard teaching in many law enforcement agencies for close range. It still works quite well. And, as well as being both fast and accurate(with practice), it keeps the weapon close to you and further away from the bad guy; both good things. Posted by: Mark at June 10, 2005 02:20 PM"Point shooting," as the term is usually used, isn't hip shooting. I'm strongly in favor of it; see http://www.pointshooting.com, which links to some good essays, as well as one of mine. :) Posted by: Joel Rosenberg at June 13, 2005 08:28 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |