Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right"
--Guardian (UK) 6/26/06

*******************


Yeah, so?


Even my cats
have guns!

serbu_sidebar_125.jpg
Me with Serbu BFG-50

Email me at:
gunnut -at-
alphecca -dot- com

Check it out:

My group sci-fi blog novel:

Colony: Alchibah






Featured in
Outdoor Life Magazine:

outdoor_small.jpg

Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer"

Alphecca gets noticed!
Check out these
GLOWING REVIEWS
I've just made up:

"Sparkles like pewter"
-- Collector's World

"Wonderful, terrific, splendid"
-- Roget's Thesaurus

"Really good"
-- Stereo World, Gun World,
Car World, Travel World,
Computer World, Roger Ebert,
Martha Stewart, Barney, etc...

"I am not an idiut"
--Barbra Streisand



Proud to be an American
US Flag
standing with Israel
Flag of Israel

PageSpinner

...but all errors and sloppy code should be blamed on me...

All non-credited writings
and photos on
Alphecca.com are
(C) Copyright
2002-2008
by Jeff Soyer
All rights reserved.



June 04, 2005

Isn't One Gun Enough?

Recently I received an email from someone who obviously doesn't share my enthusiasm for firearms. It was in response to this post about a PA gun commission rejecting, among other things, a law limiting people from purchasing more than one gun per month. I had agreed with that decision and in essence his argument was, "Isn't one gun enough?"

Having bought two guns in the past two weeks, I would (surprise!) say, "No!"

Let me elaborate. I'm sure that most people surfing into Alphecca from wherever quickly realize that I LIKE guns A LOT and I certainly blather about gun rights and the valued role of firearms in personal defense. That's not why I, or (I suspect) most gun enthusiasts purchase numerous firearms. I'm not worried about crime here in Vermont. I just like to explore and feel and touch and admire all the different varieties of guns.

Let me put it another way; why do guitar players own so many guitars? Easy answer, there: Every guitar is different. Different maker, some are acoustic, some are electric, some are 6-string, others 12-string. Different makers, different finishes, different sounds.

That's how it is with firearms. I have two .22 rifles and they are different as night-and-day. One (my Marlin 25N) is a bolt-action .22 which is the type of gun I first enjoyed as a child. The other (my Sturm Ruger 10/22) is a semi-automatic with a scope. They operate and feel completely different and I can enjoy plinking and target shooting with them in much seperate ways.

It is possible to appreciate the workmanship of various firearms as well. The crafting, etching, barrel length, grip, trigger-pull, and all the other characteristics that collectors of other things come to enjoy.

I have a revolver (an S&W Airweight .38) that, while making an excellant carry weapon, is also a throw-back to some of the earliest multi-shot guns in American history. Okay, sorta.

I have a Para Ordnance P-45 which is a full-sized .45. I have a Baretta Tom-Cat, a tiny (.32) semi. And two days ago I bought an EAA Witness-P (compact .45) handgun which is rather in the middle in size. Each is a different size, different feel. They are all interesting and unique. Three handguns, 3 sizes, 3 ways of shooting.

See, guns ARE like guitars. You want to own and shoot different makers' guns, different size bullets, different sounds.

I think that all of us "gun-nuts" like having a variety of choices at the range (or for personal defense for that matter) and I refuse to be limited just because some Brady Bunch types don't view gun collecting in the same terms they would for car collectors.

The Second Amendment doesn't say that we can only bear "one arms".

Let's make a deal: I have never endorsed trying to limit the First Amendment. Don't you try to limit the Second one. Both of them (as well as the others) are the only reason we are all still enjoying our freedoms and liberties and our pursuits of happiness here in America.

No; one gun isn't enough. Deal with it.

Posted by Jeff Soyer at June 4, 2005 08:59 AM
Comments

You don't have to be a gun nut to need more than one.

I own a plinking gun, a .22 rifle with a scope that is specifically set up for competitive use. To compete in a school rifle team, I had to own a gun similar in features to this.

I also like having a defensive gun. But a .22 rifle with scope is not a good defensive weapon - it's a single-shot bolt action, and shoots less than 600 fps, which is about fast enough to give you a nasty welt. That plinker wouldn't deter a rabid dog, nevermind a human. So I own a rather underpowered pistol, but one that's loud enough to be a deterrent and with multiple shots before I have to reload, which I've found very important in a home-defense situation.

And what if I was a hunter? Neither of the above are ideal or even reasonable weapons to use if I wanted to come home with a reasonable piece of meat and not gored by a mildly irritated buck. If I were a hunter, I'd need a higher caliber, higher speed rifle or a shotgun, depending on what I wanted to hunt.

And what if I wanted to follow the very tenant of the 2nd Ammendment? Preventing terror or tyranny with any of the above guns would be foolish at best and, more likely, suicidal.

I just have two questions for the sort of mind that asks that:

Is there ANY other device or product that has a limit of how many can be bought in a specific amount of time?

Is there ANY reason to believe that a murderer can not kill with one gun a month?

Posted by: blueeyes at June 4, 2005 05:53 PM

It's all about "choice."

Posted by: robert at June 4, 2005 10:49 PM

How about cars?
People recklessly handling cars kill many times the number killed with firearms. How would he feel about a law limiting you to only one automobile purchase a month? Who needs more then one car anyway? What normal person buys more then one car a month? Anything more and you should need a special dealer permit. I doubt your emailer has ever bought more then one car in a month, but would he like it to be a law? What if he bought a lemon and it died a week after purchase? What if after driving it a week he just didn't like it? What if he was a car collector and found his dream car for sale? Even though most people will never buy more then one car in a month, there are legitimate reasons some people do so. How would he like to be told it's against the law? Now that I think about it, he probably wouldn't mind. Those types are more then happy to give up their rights and freedoms "for the good of society".

Posted by: Chris at June 5, 2005 10:56 AM

The assumption underlying the entire

"one-gun-a-month" argument is this:

"guns cause shootings".

Therefore, if you reduce the number of new guns,

you necessarily reduce the number of shootings.

Given the number of guns already in private hands,

This is absurd on its face. However, what is

demonstrably true is: If you reduce the number of

shooters, you necessarily reduce the number of

shootings. Sadly, while this is clearly a

logical truth, it is not a political

one in Philadelphia County or Allegheny

County (Pittsburgh).

Posted by: Voolfie at June 5, 2005 12:03 PM

I've been asked the same question before. My answer usually runs along this line:

How many books does a person really need? Isn't one a month? Might you suspect that there's something wrong about someone with filled bookshelves in their living room, den, kitchen, every bedroom and basement? And why do we really need so many newspapers, magazines, radio and TV stations to provide information? Wouldn't one be enough? How about religous nuts? I know a lot of people who think that anybody who attends church more than once a month is probably incipient theocrat, just waiting to impose his or her will on everybody else. Isn't Christmas and Easter (or Rosh Hashanah and Pesach) enough?

If the person hasn't walked away by this point, he or she frequently asks, "well then, how many guns do you own?" Although the count increases monotonically over time, the answer is always the same: more than I need to do the job or can afford; not nearly as many as I want.

Posted by: Strophyx at June 5, 2005 08:14 PM

I foresee a time in the future when i will no longer live on a boat. I hope at that time to get involved in Cowboy Action Shooting, and I would like to purchase a pair of Ruger Vaquero six guns. My preference would be for matching engraved weapons with sequential serial numbers. Both would be purchased as a special order through Ruger's engraving program at the same time.

I would also need a repeating rifle (something like a Henry) and a double-barrel shot gun, probably the Stoeger Couch Gun Supreme in polished nickel, with black furniture.

Don't know if I would buy these all at once, but if I did, that would be 4 guns in one month.

Posted by: Zendo Deb at June 6, 2005 01:26 PM

My husband and I get a lot of questions about that, too.

Snort.

We collect guns of military interest and most of them are pretty old. I could not even tell you how many guns we have - lots and lots of them.

Why do we have them? It's my husband's passion - history and the military and weapons. And that should be reason enough!

Posted by: Beth Donovan at June 6, 2005 02:36 PM
Note: Comments close down on posts after seven days and then
the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that.

By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...



Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah.
See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips.