|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
May 12, 2005Rice Re-Affirms Gun SupportWe've noted this before but Condi Rice has stated AGAIN (on Larry King) that she firmly supports the Second Amendment. From Yahoo/AP:
That does it! Since all the TV talking-heads are already speculating about 2008, and as a mostly one-issue voter, I'm throwing my support behind Dr. Condoleezza Rice for President. That is, unless Glenn finally does pick up the gauntlet! Seriously though, there are no appealing candidates standing out right now for the coming (well, in two years anyway) primaries. Rice has always struck me as far more moderate than many on her side of the aisle. While I am "pro-life" I am not rabidly so and can live with her being not rabidly "pro-choice". I suspect she could care less about banning "gay marriage" or other issues of the far-right and she's clearly comfortable with the notion of defending our nation from the mutants who threaten it. There's no-one on the Democratic side that I could bring myself to vote for. Hillary? Not in this lifetime. Rudy? Hopelessly anti-2A. So Condi: You go girl! Update: Comments
I said this (in response to a post on the same topic) on Gwa.45's site: Rice-Sanford '08 Sanford is the current governor of SC. Posted by: Heartless Libertarian at May 12, 2005 08:17 AMShe is moderate on abortion, which is why she might not get the Republican nomination. And as we just saw, is not moderate on gun control, so has no chance at the Democratic nomination. I agree with you though - I am much more interested in reining in gun control than I am in the nuances of a woman's right to chose, etc. In other words, I am an abortion moderate, but fairly strong in my gun control views. Posted by: Bruce Hayden at May 12, 2005 10:22 AMMe three. Posted by: Ken Summers at May 12, 2005 10:33 AMI would vote for Ms. Rice in a heartbeat, for many reasons, not least of which is the cosmic joke on the Democrats that the first woman, minority president be a conservative Republican. Posted by: Ray_g at May 12, 2005 11:07 AMHL: For a minute there I thought you meant Fred Sanford. I was afraid I woul dhave to break the news to you that Redd Foxx died some years ago. I do think Lamont or Grady are still available to run, though. Posted by: submandave at May 12, 2005 12:06 PMA mystery -- I went to Larry King live website, and looked at the transcript. No mention of right to arms at all. No idea what's up here. Posted by: Dave Hardy at May 12, 2005 12:08 PMI kind of like Erlich from MD. He's totally ticking off the Dems and winning. While I'd normally second your nomination in a red hot minute (because I really like Condoleeza Rice), the last time I seconded a presidential nomination it went nowhere. So this time maybe I should keep my mouth shut. Posted by: Eric Scheie at May 12, 2005 12:24 PMI'm with Dave. There is simply no mention of the second amendment at all in the trascript from last night program. Posted by: countertop at May 12, 2005 02:52 PMIt was purely coincidental that I came across the comment about the lack of mention in the Transcript. I've updated my post. On another note, I had referenced an article by David T. Hardy in my post, then I come to find it was a David Hardy that noticed the lack of these quotes in the CNN Transcript. Odd. Posted by: The Indigent Blogger at May 12, 2005 03:17 PMI'd like to link this in my next Carnival of Cordite: http://gullyborg.typepad.com/carnival_of_cordite/ Thanks! Posted by: Gullyborg at May 12, 2005 04:16 PMI didn't see the show. Did any of you? Did she talk about the 2nd Amendment? If so, then maybe CNN (which is extremely anti-gun) decided to edit that part out of the transcript. Of course, that makes it sound like a conspiracy... Posted by: Jeff Soyer at May 12, 2005 04:29 PMI hate to burst your bubble here, but it's well-known at Stanford that Condi is gay. She has no chance in the republican primary. Posted by: Evan at May 12, 2005 05:47 PMEvan - First, why would that burst anyones bubble? Especially here, at the gay gun nuts blog? Who really cares? But of course, its also well known that she dated a certain college football coach the entire time she was at Stanford and well into her time with the Administration. Seriously though, while I don't know her, I know enough people in the administration who do and they all confirmed the rumors about the football coach to me. I don't buy the gay stuff that seems to have originated on lefty blogs like Tom Paine. Posted by: countertop at May 12, 2005 09:46 PMJeff Soyer, Bruce Hayden: The abortion debate essentially divides into two camps: One side says life begins at birth and the other says life begins somewhere between inception and birth. You may not vote exclusively for that (i.e. a single-issue voter for abortion), but to say that you're moderate on the issue is rather a misnomer. Personally I'm strongly against abortion, particularly after the zygote becomes an embryo.But then again, if I was an American and the only presidential candidate against abortion is also against the right to bear arms, wants to severely curtail free speech, wants to significantly reduce the size of the military, etc. - I may vote for a "pro-choice" candidate if they are not militantly against illegalizing abortion. Posted by: Rajan R at May 13, 2005 08:09 AMFrom the interview: If she's serious about that, then there's no way she would run for US President, especially in 2008. Now, I suppose she might sit the next administration out, decide she wants to get back in the game, and maybe in 2012 or 2016 we can vote for Rice. But surely not in 2008. Posted by: Matt at May 13, 2005 03:21 PMWell, if'n you are interested in the Condi 2008 movement, come over to Americans For Dr. Rice. We don't for a moment believe that Condi isn't being groomed for the Big Girl's Chair, especially since Hillary is obviously the one who'll be running for the Donks. We have heard the lesbian stuff, too. Didn't know what to make of it until countertop spoke of the football coach. Sounds to me like the guy who went from Stanford on to Notre Dame. Forget his name, now. We at AFR are, at present kicking off a radio ad campaign in New Hampshire and Florida. We are on two stations, WNTK in New Hampshire and WKAT in Miami. We are rolling out a second New Hampshire station, WKXL in Concord next week. We are testing several radio commercial spots as prototypes for television ads to be used in the 2006 cycle next year. Go to the site for spot samples. Naturally, Rice's position on RKBA is music to our ears. ok knuckleheads let's talk is Condi Rice a lesbian or not each time she is in a interview they always refer back to her job and probe to find if she is dating someone I personally say she is gay and why won't a interviewer just come right out and ask or do they think they will be black/white balled in the media Posted by: lady hb at May 13, 2005 10:37 PMThe bubble bursting is the reality that she's as close now (behind Cheney, Hasstert, & Stevens) to the Presidency as she every will be. The woman is gay and republicans don't like gay people. I can't put it more plainly. Posted by: Evan Branigan at May 14, 2005 02:09 AMEvan, only a few Republicans "don't like gays". I'd venture a guess that I have a mostly libertarian/republican readership and none of them (or very few) "don't like gays". Most could care less. Take a look at my (reciprocol) blogroll. There are a lot of "Blogs for Bush" on there, plenty of "Blogs for God", et al. They have no trouble blogrolling/linking to me. Even if that were true, though, the right-wingers don't seem to have as big a problem with lesbians as they do with gay guys. And think of the triangulation the Republicans could accomplish by nominating a black, lesbian, woman candidate. Heck, they'd out-democrat the Democrats with the special interest groups! Posted by: Jeff Soyer at May 14, 2005 10:11 AMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |