|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
March 28, 2005Ban All Guns?That seems to be the implication by Laura Washington in this Chicago Sun-Times editorial:
The guns Weise stole from his grandfather (and used on him) were ordinary ones by Main Stream Media standards. The gun used at the Atlanta courthouse was a service pistol taken from a guard. I mention these two examples because no matter how draconian new gun control legislation becomes, it would not have prevented these shootings. Banning "assault weapons" wouldn't have done it because so-called "assault weapons" weren't involved. Closing the "gun show loophole" wouldn't have prevented anything in these cases. Therefore, I can only assume that while the writer dismisses such suggestions as curbing media violence and closer monitoring of kids, she seems to think that -- since it's all the fault of the gun -- those have to disappear from our culture. Does she then mean ALL GUNS? But that's not ever going to happen because criminals will never surrender theirs. It will simply leave the rest of us at the mercy of soaring crime by emboldened mutants as has happened in England and Australia. I had predicted that op-eds like this would start appearing in short order after the Red Lake incident. Unfortunately, I was right. Comments
When they call it "gun violence", it's an attempt to pass the blame onto the tool instead of the user. If we pushed a magic button and made all guns disappear, then we'd have nutters attacking schools with crossbows, and concerned-sounding soccer moms whining about "crossbow violence" This debate is about the right to use force for self defense, not guns. Given free reign, these people would ban anything marketable as a weapon, censor any speech or publication that promotes self defense (because it "glorifies violence! oh no!", even ban martial arts training, all to make a world where they wouldn't fear others flipping out and injuring them. Just look how close they are to all that in the UK. And why do they fear others? Because going postal is what many of THEM would do if they carried weapons. These are the hysterical people who scream at you in the parking lot, flip you off on I-95, and yell at their kids in the checkout line. They can't control their temper, so they assume no one else can either and therefore wish to disarm the rest of us. It won't work, of course. A determined man with a metal pipe in a subway car is no better than one with a pistol. Posted by: Tim in PA at March 28, 2005 05:39 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |