|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
March 18, 2005A Few Thoughts on Terri SchiavoRegulars know that I am pro-life. I'm not rabidly so, I don't picket or march on the issue and I don't write about it much here, but I am. I don't buy the argument that it's simply a "woman's right to her own reproductive decisions". The baby might not have been born yet but it is still alive. Certainly by 4-5 months the nervous system is developed enough that the fetus can feel things. Certainly the fact that mothers can feel the child moving or "kicking" is proof that there are nerve synapses firing. That unborn child can also feel it's own death if aborted. I have no argument with what a woman chooses to do with her own body. My concern is for the body within her body. Now, I believe that an adult, for whatever reason, has the right to take their own life. Maybe they're in excruciating pain. Maybe they just hate the hand they've been dealt and want to fold. I don't care. I do not attach any stigmata to suicide. That's not inconsistant with my pro-life position because in my case, neither are predicated on any religious teachings. They are simply what seems logical to me. An adult can make decisions for him/herself. In fact, I have no problem with doctor assisted suicide, either. A youngster isn't emotionally stable enough -- mature enough if you will -- to do that and so they should be prevented from taking their own life. An unborn child is at the mercy of a woman practicing "reproductive health". This brings me to Terri Schiavo. I won't recount the details because you all know them already. Let me just say that if she had penned a living-will, or had said in front of many people that she would not want to be kept alive by extraordinary means then I would be all for removing her feeding tube. I would not want to be kept alive if I was in a years-long coma, with no detectable brain activity. Unfortunately, no such document was made. Her husband Michael claims she said she wouldn't want to be kept alive by a feeding tube but we have only his word for it. There's one other concern of mine: There have been a few instances where people in long-term comas, believed to be "brain dead" did in fact "wake up" one day and many have gone on to lead wonderful lives. I won't list them here but a quick search on Google will show you that. Sometimes brains can take a very long time to heal, to build new pathways for messages to travel by. Perhaps the brain is simply hiding in shock from the initial incident. So, Terri can't speak for herself and her husband has been granted a divorce, I believe? I read that he has a fiance. Or maybe he's waiting for her to die so he can remarry. I don't know but I do not believe he has Terri's best interests in mind. Without specific knowledge that Terri would want to end her life, I believe she should be kept alive. I am saddened that for all the political and legal contortions, the feeding tube has been removed. Death by starvation cannot be pleasant. But would she feel anything? Oh yes, I think she will. I believe there is still some dream activity going on within her mind, at a level that might not be able to be recorded. Sometimes, when I'm sleeping, I dream of thirst or hunger, and seeking water or food. I would imagine that Terri Schiavo will unfortunately experience days or weeks of such nightmares. Lastly, again -- without any real proof that she approves of being allowed to die -- a civilization is judged by how it cares for those who are least able to care for themselves, be it an unborn child or a comatose woman. America seems to fail at both. My prayers are with Terri Schiavo and my hope is that God will work a miracle. Comments
I'm right with you on this one. I think the main thing that bothers me here is that I don't really see a feeding tube as "extraordinary measures" or "life support." It's basic feeding. I could understand the husband's position if this was about disconnecting a ventilator and she couldn't continue to live without it. Anyhow, I agree with you on the issue of adults having the right to decide when to end their lives. This is a good example of a situation where some sort of assisted suicide would be warranted, provided that the adult had a clearly defined living will that covered the given situation. This reminds me that perhaps I should do something similar myself. I wouldn't want to live like Terri Schiavo is living, but neither would I want to starve to death. I suppose I'd better get it all in writing now to prevent anyone else from having to make those kinds of decisions. Unfortunately, the law as it exists in most states right now would prevent the option that I'd exercise should I be in that position (and those damn Feds have taken the position that it's not up to us or the states). Posted by: Aubrey Turner at March 19, 2005 03:38 PMThanks, Aubrey. Are you saying that most states don't allow living wills? That you can't specify that you don't want to be kept alive by external means, as it were? Posted by: Jeff Soyer at March 19, 2005 05:40 PMHer husband has moved on... He should have left Terry to her parents. Although it is entertaining to see the lefty pundits on TV try to twist this one. If only she was a mass-murderer they'd care right? Posted by: DANEgerus at March 19, 2005 11:35 PMJeff, No, I was referring to the concept of physician assisted suicide. A few states (Oregon is one that I can recall) passed laws to allow it, but the feds stepped in to fight those laws. As far as I know, living wills are OK everywhere. Posted by: Aubrey Turner at March 20, 2005 11:11 AMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |