|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
February 21, 2005Their Gun Problem is Our Fault?I'm not doing a Weekly Bias this week because starting tomorrow I'll be in meetings for several days at the company where I work. But that doesn't mean that I can't report on a bit of media bias this morning... From KGBT TV (TX):
Here in America we have a Bill of Rights. The writer of this story has apparently forgotten that. Texas -- properly -- doesn't require the registration of firearms. Why should they? Registration is the first step towards confiscation as we've seen in England, Australia, Canada, California, et al. Why should the state (actual or federal or local) be allowed to compile a list of what guns we own? If we are law-abiding, our personal property should be just that: Personal. Secondly, if Mexicans are taking advantage of straw-purchases to obtain firearms, it is only because the Mexican government has determined that while their country is overrun by drug dealers and criminals and corrupt police officials, their subjects are not entitled to the means to protect themselves. Well too fucking bad if their citizens sneak across the border to obtain some protection for themselves. The "Feds" as this writer puts it shouldn't even be concerned if guns are flowing into Mexico. It's not their business to care about the problems of another country unless that country threatens the U.S. I don't see President Fox and his cronies giving a rat's ass that drugs are flowing from Mexico into the U.S. It was only a few short years ago that Connecticut banned condoms. They couldn't be sold in stores so Connecticut residents had to drive to NY or MA to obtain them. How silly was that? Massachusetts residents constantly drive across the border to New Hampshire to buy stuff because NH has no sales tax. Is that a problem for NH? Quite the opposite, it's allowed cities such as Nashua to grow into retail giant meccas. The problem is Massachusetts'. Maybe they should consider scrapping their own sales tax and cut their spending to reasonable levels. Mexico denies their people the right to self-defense. Those people will -- rightly -- seek it where they can. But that's a problem for the Mexican government, not the U.S. government. To blame the State of Texas for "a problem" in another nation is just plain bullshit. By the way, how stupid do the writers at KGBT4 TV think we all are that they have to put the phonetic pronunciation of a name into the news story? If I was a viewer of their station I'd be truly insulted and I'd let them know it. Talk about a condescending and derogatory attitude towards your consumers! Comments
I would not blame KGBT4 TV for condescending and derogatory attitude. Instead the real culprit is shown at the bottom of the story. Information from: The Brownsville Herald, http://www.brownsvilleherald.com "Copyright 2005 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed." Posted by: Paul L at February 21, 2005 09:34 AMI don't know what sort of magical powers you've got, but I can't flawlessly pronounce every random name I come across. (Can you get my last name correct?) Personally I think it would be nice if more news sources started including pronunciations. And, probably, the AP includes that information so that when the stories make their way to radio and TV stations, the commentators can pronounce the name correctly. Stick to the issue. You're in the right, so there isn't any need to beat them up on unrelated issues. Posted by: Jay Kominek at February 21, 2005 12:28 PMGoing to be interesting to see if these protectors of the Federal Bureacracy can get organized enough to bust CNN reporter Drew Griffith. He may not be a Mexican but he DID, (by his own description), buy a terrorist firearm and haul it across state lines. Well see. Posted by: robert at February 21, 2005 09:14 PMConnecticut banned condoms?! Geez. What'll they think of next? Wait, don't answer that. Posted by: jed at February 21, 2005 09:40 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |