|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
February 15, 2005What Shakespeare Said...
Can lawsuits over tornados, hurricanes, ice-storms, meteor strikes, droughts, floods, et cetera be far behind? There is a sickness in this world and civil trial lawyers are to blame. Posted by Jeff Soyer at February 15, 2005 01:01 PM Comments
We must be careful not to over-generalize. 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name. Posted by: Steven Malcolm Anderson at February 16, 2005 01:01 AMCan we at least deduct the number of lawyers from the casualties of the tsunami disaster? Posted by: billy-jay at February 16, 2005 07:14 AMI'm not usually on the side of the government, but shouldn't the plaintiff have to actually prove negligence on the part of the NOAA, the hotels, etc? And since when does the mission statement, or for that matter, authority and responsibility, of the NOAA extend past the maritime economic interest boundaries of the United States? Posted by: Heartless Libertarian at February 16, 2005 10:09 AMHL, don't look at it as being on the side of the government, look at is as being on the side of common sense. Posted by: billy-jay at February 16, 2005 10:18 AMThere was a report issued by the Pacific tsunami watch group that noted an earthquake at a certain latitude and longitude; it then went on to say that no warning would follow as that was not in the Pacific ocean. Perhaps this is the grounds for the suit. I think an analogous situation would be for a fire to occur in Tijuana, visible from San Diego, and for the victims to then sue the San Diego Fire Department for not responding. It should get tossed out. Posted by: Paul at February 16, 2005 01:14 PMActually, Shakespeare wasn't talking about what we call lawyers today, but the legislators. Not that in any way diminishes the Bard's brilliance. Ross in range on that misquote Posted by: Addison at February 17, 2005 04:06 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |