|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
January 16, 2005TV Sitcoms, and Other Stuff...I just got home from work (yes, I work Saturdays and Sundays) and spent the past hour de-spamming and now that includes de-ping-spamming... *Sigh* Anyway, my current schedule at my real job is that I am off Mondays and Tuesdays. My Weekly Report will be up around Noon tomorrow, I'll put it together in the morning. Tonight I'm going to take it easy and drink cheap wine and watch -- how sick is this? -- the first season of Green Acres... Nobody ever said my taste wasn't in my mouth... I like the old comedies I grew-up with. And I have to say, to me, you could have crappy writing but with a good ensemble cast of pro's, you'd have a great TV show. Maybe that's why some of my favorite sit-coms include, besides Green Acres, such shows as the Mary Tyler Moore Show, The Odd Couple, The Dick Van Dyke Show, Petticoat Junction, the first couple seasons of Mash, and who could forget the Adams Family, News Radio (the late Phil Hartman was a one-man comedy team), and one of my all time favorites, The Carol Burnett Show. A lot of shows are currently being remade. Folks, the only reason to remake something is if you can add something new and fresh to it or improve it. If the old movie was superb, don't bother trying again. You'll usually (Titanic was an exception) have a flop on your hands. Special effects don't make for a story to me although I suppose it's enough for those under 15-years-old. I never thought much of the original Gilligan's Island (although others think differently) so I don't really care if there's a remake. But The Honeymooners is different. Simply put, this was one of the best shows ever put on TV. The cast, Jackie Gleason, Art Carney, Audrey Meadows, and Joyce Randolph, were so good, so perfect, so brilliant in their performances, that any new actor or actress who even attempts to recreate these roles is doomed to failure.
I have to single-out Jackie, Art, and Audrey. They were so fantastically good that there is no way anyone could ever play their parts again. By the way, I never speak of my family but two of them played in the CBS orchestra and knew Gleason. Unfailingly they state that he WAS the greatest, and he was kind, generous, funny, loved to party and made sure that all who worked on his shows -- even the janitors -- partied with him. And he liked to party. But that's besides the point. The point is that this was an unusual show (even by today's standards) showing a struggling couple (financially, if nothing else) who were supremely likable, had their fights, but always made-up in the end. The show needed no, and resorted to no sexual innuendo. Granted, it was the fifties. But I guarantee you the remake will resort to such. That's all Hollywood has to offer these days, along with tired special effects. There would be no point, and indeed it would be considered folly, to try to improve on da Vinci's Mona Lisa. So too, how stupid could any movie studio be to try to do another version of the Honeymooners? Anyway, that's my story and I'm sticking to it. Call me an old fuddy-duddy. Check back around lunch time for my Weekly Thing. And thanks to another kind person who hit the tip-jar. That makes four this month which is more than the previous three put together. Thanks so much! Now where's that chablis?
Comments
I'm always showing my age to Deb when we talk about old TV. Even things like Olympics, when I note that the first Winter Olympics I remember at all was 1968, watching Peggy Fleming, and the first one I remember vividly was 1972. Actually, that goes for the summer too, but different memories. Especially 1972... It's like a generation gap indicator, comparing whether you saw Star Trek when it originally aired, or Star Wars when it appeared in theaters originally, or not. Posted by: Jay at January 17, 2005 07:46 AMThe Honeymooners was already remade. It was called The Flintstones. :) Posted by: Ian Hamet at January 17, 2005 10:43 AMYou are so correct, Ian, and I had forgotten that! And it may only have been a cartoon but the Flintstones was also brilliant. Posted by: Jeff Soyer at January 17, 2005 10:57 AMIf it's a generation gap, it's got a shadow effect. I'm 24, and a LOT of other kids in my generation who grew up with cable TV have seen most if not all of these old shows... on Nick at Nite. I used to be a MAJOR Nick at Nite addict as an insomniac kid, which is why I love the Dick Van Dyke show, Get Smart, Dragnet, the old Bewitched, and so on. Posted by: LabRat at January 17, 2005 04:58 PMThe last time I saw Jackie Gleason on TV, on some late night or variety show, he was very proud of the fact that he had lost a lot of weight. He used to need a big belt to hold up his pants, but now he could do it with a little belt. And you know how he liked a little belt now and then... Posted by: triticalet at January 17, 2005 10:13 PMCome on now! Gilligans Island rocked!! And as far as MASH is concerned, your right. The first couple of seasons were great, then started to go down hill somewhat. It really took a dive when "B.J." arrived on the scene. Somebody else took over the writing duties I think! Oh well. My 2 cents. Paul Posted by: Paul at January 18, 2005 04:38 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |