|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
December 29, 2004Gang Bangers ARE TerroristsA NYC mutant gang member has been indicted under NY State laws as a terrorist. His family, and some members of the elitest left think that's too harsh. From Reuters:
Uh, no Lidia, they're not. These gangs of mutant thugs run around killing people, selling drugs, robbing people's homes, running "protection rackets" and making life miserable for all the decent law-abiding folks in the inner cities. If using terrorism laws will put a piece of crap like Morales away FOREVER then I say go for it. Otherwise, he would only get 25-life and that isn't enough for cold-blooded, premeditated murder. And maybe if his mother had raised him better, he wouldn't have gotten involved in gangs. Maybe. I don't want to blame parents for the defective brains of their kids. If you really want to see some parents who SHOULD be blamed for their creepy children, watch "Wife Swap". Watch the elitest rich liberals who can't last one day actually having to take care of a family and do chores. They haven't a clue of what children need in parenting -- how could they? They spend almost NO time with them. I saw segments on Oprah the other day and I was just amazed at the rudeness and condescending attitude of the NYC creeps. Those are Democrats. They're the ones who think we-all are stupid morons, red-necks with no culture. And they wonder why we don't want them running our country... Comments
If using terrorism laws will put a piece of crap like Morales away FOREVER then I say go for it. Otherwise, he would only get 25-life and that isn't enough for cold-blooded, premeditated murder. The problem is that the legislature disagrees with you, or else they'd have allowed for stiffer sentences for premeditated murder. Posted by: jpe at December 29, 2004 03:23 PMI've gotta call bull$#!+ on that. A 70 count indictment? That's part of what's wrong with our "justice" system. If he's guilty of murdering a ten year old girl, then convict him of that and sentence him appropriately for that. Anything else just endangers the rest of us. Posted by: billy-jay at December 30, 2004 08:30 AMNote: my comment was directed at the blog post, not jpe's rather reasonable comment above. Posted by: billy-jay at December 30, 2004 08:30 AMI disagree on this one. Any power granted to the Gov ends up being miss-used. Mission creep. The TSA was set up to catch terrorists....but since there aren't any terrorists dumb enough get caught when flying coach, they end up hassling the rest of us and groping the cute women. Drug law, terrorist law, gun law...I think it ALL ought to be abolished. Posted by: robert at December 30, 2004 08:44 AM Well, I guess we'll just have to disagree about this one. I think that anything that insures that a murderous mutant is locked-up forever is worth it, including piling-on charges. Posted by: Jeff Soyer at December 30, 2004 10:30 AMJeff, the obvious problem with that is that feds pile on charges on anybody, including those innocent of wrongdoing, knowing that the sheer magnitude of trouble faced by the accused will likely result in a plea-bargained guilty plea. That is, the murderous mutants aren't the only ones to get screwed by those tactics. Posted by: billy-jay at December 30, 2004 10:37 AMJeff, nice blog, BTW. Posted by: billy-jay at December 30, 2004 10:38 AMThe BATF is notorious for using the "piling on" tactics when going after people. Charging persons with an offense per bullet, and other such nonsense. Posted by: Mark at December 30, 2004 01:34 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |