|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
May 17, 2004Weekly Check on the Bias...By golly, once again it's time to turn our attention (well, my attention) to the bias exibited by the media in it's reporting of gun control and gun ownership stories. I scan the world for newspaper items to find items that might interest you. Every week I try to generate a theme here. Two weeks ago it was a pop-quiz, last week it was the dozen moms march, and this week...
Dangerous Planet Edition
Now I know you're thinking, "huh? A forest fire?" Okay, it wasn't the busiest week in the press for gun stuff. We live in a dangerous world. There are forest fires, volcanos, and floods, oh my. And there's not a whole lot you can do to prevent such natural disasters, although if authorities ask you to evacuate, do it. And it doesn't hurt to have a small survival kit and supplies either. Then, of course, there's the danger of Western civilization collapsing from a certain court ruling in Massachusetts... But there are other dangers we all face almost everyday. Now bear with me, or should I say mountain lion with me...
You remember that bicyclist who was attacked and killed by a mountain lion in a California park during the past Winter? So do a lot of the folks who frequent that park, and now they're packing some protection. From the LA Times:
The tone of this article seems to be (judging by all the anti-gun quotes included) that people shouldn't be carrying a firearm. They should (if they have one) cell-phone the police and, oh, just hang around for a while waiting for them to show up while the lion munches on their legs. Notice how this "retired police captain" thinks it's fine for him to carry, but not for anyone else because after all, pointing a gun at an attacking animal and pulling the trigger must be far beyond the skills of the average Californian. Here's another quote:
The fact that the LA Times couldn't actually come up with a history of hikers and bikers being mistaken for cougers and shot in the park wasn't mentioned. The good news is that attacks by four-legged predators is extremely rare. The bad news is that attacks by the two-legged ones aren't. From the (LA) Leesville Daily Leader:
I guess I just don't understand how the Brady Bunch, and others who would like to see all handguns magically disappear don't see the wisdom, indeed the need, for folks to be able to protect themselves. By the way, this story was short and to the point with absolutely no editorializing. Typical of small newspapers and almost unheard of from the national ones. Of course, the New York Times, Washington Post, et al, never actually report any defensive gun uses so... The Houston Chronicle also kept it short and sweet with this story of a man defending himself from burglers:
I don't know why, but the phrase "may have managed to wound one of his attackers..." almost sounds like the writer was glad. I know I am and I'm sure the cops are. Not all the mutants are carrying guns... From Keep and Bear Arms comes this WXII TV (NC) story:
All it would have taken was for just one of those four men to pull out a pistol and point it at Steed and Allen and the event would have been over. Unfortunately, they were not armed. Perhaps we could use an "assault chainsaw ban." Not all of the dangers to us come from criminals. Sometimes they come from politicians. John Kerry for instance... From the Arkansas Times-Record:
Kerry still doesn't get it. The Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting and fishing. It has EVERYTHING to do with the right to bear arms for personal defense. Woodchucks are not out there threatening people. Criminals (oh okay, and cougers) are. I am not a fan of G.W. Bush, but I can honestly tell you that hell will freeze over before I cast a vote for Kerry. Not all the political news was bad. Indeed, President Bush's brother, Florida governor Jeb Bush. From the AP:
Notice how the AP writer HAS to insert that the NRA "pushed hard" for the bill, as if there's something wrong with a lobbying group, well you know, lobbying... Too bad Jeb isn't running for president! I suspect (from the intent of these bills) that he believes the Second Amendment is about much more than simply "hunting and fishing." Speaking of hunting and fishing (how's this for a segue) [Segway, it's more than just a stupid way to get around... -ed.], why not combine the two? I mentioned this story last week from the New York Times:
Using an AK-47 to hunt fish. I wonder how John Kerry feels about that?
Here's what some other pro-2A bloggers are posting about: The Countertop Chronicles also covered the fish-hunting story and Pervasive Light did as well. Just goes to show that sometimes I'm behind the Times... (Get it? Oh, never mind... I'm almost three hours working on this post...) Say Uncle checks in with a try it, you might like it story about target shooting. And while I'm at it [warning, danger, another segue... --ed.] [I'm starting to write like Kaus now! --js], while Les Jones was gallivanting around the US, Say Uncle filled in admirably with the Thursday Gun Links. Daily Pundit relates the story of a disabled man going to jail for defending his life. The Smallest Minority celebrates his blogiversary. A super staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. Congratulations, Kevin. And just in case Illinois gun owners don't have it tough enough, the Spoons Experience reports on the Governor's latest arm-twisting. Well folks, I guess this is a wrap for this edition. I'm simply out of steam... Thanks for stopping by!
Comments
O. K. Have to wait a bit 'til heart and breath rates get back to normal. Alright, here it is: So, you're a cop. Isn't that *special*? Aren't you cute? Aarrgh!
He isn't a REAL cop. He's a Captain. If you want to know how real cops feel about any issue, ask a captain or a chief, then turn their answer around 180 degrees. Posted by: George at May 17, 2004 08:33 AMI grew up in what we call the backcountry. I always have a pistol in my truck in a key pad lock box or if I'm hiking, I carry in an old Safari Land holster. Mountain lions and bears? No. I carry because of human predators. I usually see five or six mountain lions a year. In the past five years I've had to point them out to people who were with me. No training in how to look and no situational awareness. When I was a kid, all I had to do was to turn towards them and maybe start to raise my always present .22 and they'd take off. Now, they may sit and watch me. If they're closer than 50 metres and still watching after I turn towards them, I'll give them a lesson by putting a round close to them. With cats your're either a fellow predator or you're potential prey. It's no wonder we're seeing all the recent attacks. In the last three years two of my friends have actually had to shoot a couple who were too close and showing pre attack behavior. In California, we never, ever report a shooting, BTW. Posted by: 115th INTC at May 17, 2004 12:46 PMYou wrote, Wrong. I think he does. He was a prosecuter. 115th INTC: Here in California, the expression is "shoot, shovel, and shut up" Posted by: Ken Summers at May 17, 2004 02:06 PMYou wrote "It has EVERYTHING to do with the right to bear arms for personal defense." Wrong. It has everything to do with defense against the government. The Republicans, more so than Democrats, want to boost defense spending for their defense contractor friends. A Tek-9 is not going to stop the newest stealth fighter. Who are you kidding? Posted by: Hey! at May 17, 2004 02:13 PMHey!, Sure it will, if you shoot the pilot before he gets in. Yours, Yet another excellent analysis of the bi-ass in the gun-hating media. Thank you. The right to keep and bear arms is an absolute. The right to defend your rights is the precondition for having any rights at all. As for the argument that guns would be ineffective against a tyrannical government, the 13 colonies won their independence from the British Empire. The Viet Cong held off against the mighty United States. (They were Commies, yes, but they did show that it can be done.) The Afghans held off against the Soviet Empire. (I know, I know, they got the Taliban, which was worse, but they did show that it can be done.) The examples are all different, I know, but the tie-in is that, in all three cases, a rag-tag guerilla army managed to defeat a mighty empire. Even if you have to go down fighting, it is still better to die on your feet than to live on your knees (Massada, the Warsaw Ghetto). Posted by: Steven Malcolm Anderson at May 19, 2004 12:21 PMFirearms are so 18th century! What we need is an amendment on the constitution so that everyone can own a baggie full of biological weapons! That's the only way to stop a tyrannical populace, er I mean tyrannical government, these days! Posted by: Alexia at May 19, 2004 03:30 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |