Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right"
--Guardian (UK) 6/26/06

*******************


Yeah, so?


Even my cats
have guns!

serbu_sidebar_125.jpg
Me with Serbu BFG-50

Email me at:
gunnut -at-
alphecca -dot- com

Check it out:

My group sci-fi blog novel:

Colony: Alchibah






Featured in
Outdoor Life Magazine:

outdoor_small.jpg

Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer"

Alphecca gets noticed!
Check out these
GLOWING REVIEWS
I've just made up:

"Sparkles like pewter"
-- Collector's World

"Wonderful, terrific, splendid"
-- Roget's Thesaurus

"Really good"
-- Stereo World, Gun World,
Car World, Travel World,
Computer World, Roger Ebert,
Martha Stewart, Barney, etc...

"I am not an idiut"
--Barbra Streisand



Proud to be an American
US Flag
standing with Israel
Flag of Israel

PageSpinner

...but all errors and sloppy code should be blamed on me...

All non-credited writings
and photos on
Alphecca.com are
(C) Copyright
2002-2008
by Jeff Soyer
All rights reserved.



May 16, 2004

Buying That First Gun

A friend emailed me the other day about what gun he should buy for his first one. I asked for permission to publish it, along with my reply to him, here since I think my advice was good for anyone considering such a step. Although he gave me permission to, I'm not going to use his name.

Anyway, first, his letter:


I'm going to buy my very first gun in the next ten days. And I'm going to be signing myself up for a safety course on the same day. Only one problem. I have no idea about what gun to buy. Two criteria (which are probably obvious):

a. I want it to be effective - We've had a couple home invasions in our area. If someone breaks into our house at night, I don't want a gun that's just going to knock him down. I want a gun that will make sure he doesn't get back up.

b. I am a beginnner - I want a gun that's fairly simple to use, easy to keep clean, with good safety features.

A store clerk told me a Beretta 9mm is a good choice because of the safety features and ease of use. Another person (one of the customers) told me he preferred a Glock .45. However, the customer seemed experienced, and so I have no doubt it might have been a better choice for him. The Beretta seemed kind of big to me. I saw the Glock, but didn't lift it. It looked fairly light and compact, but the store clerk told me the safety features weren't as good as the Beretta. I'm not so sure I need to be worried about the safety features as much as the clerk thinks. I'm going to buy the gun, and the only time it will come out of the lock box is if I go to the range, or I if, god forbid, I have to use it. Safety features are good. But the Glock was about $200 cheaper.

Anyway, if you have time, could you answer two questions?? - well, 3 including this one :-)

1. Do you have any suggestions about guns that might be good for me?
2. I looked at these guns at Gallyan's - a national sporting goods store (the Beretta was nearly $600 - ouch.). What's your opinion of buying from a store like that as opposed to a pawn shop? Seems to me that a used gun is not something I want to screw around with - at least not until I get to know more about guns.

Now for my reply:


I'm glad you have decided to take the step of protecting yourself. Before I give my own opinions, let me first direct you to a site I'm an occasional contributor to, The Shooter's Carnival:

The Shooters' Carnival

and specifically to:

Beginner's category

which lists articles you might find interesting.

NOW...

I assume you were probably looking at the Beretta 92, or similar model. I've always found the grip a little large on them myself so (out of the myriad of guns I've bought and sold over the years) never owned one. Berettas are nicely made but usually not easy to disassemble for cleaning. They are expensive.

You should absolutely not buy a Glock at this stage in your "gun-ownership career." Yes, they are lighter than many models and yes, they are reliable. However, they have NO real safety features because the only safety is in the trigger -- that is, unless you are pressing the trigger, the gun will not go off. Sounds reasonable but in fact it is dangerous enough that while many police forces use them, many cops -- each year -- wind-up shooting themselves in the leg or foot when they withdraw the Glock from their holster. It's too easy for a piece of clothing, or even just forgetful carelessness by the owner to lead to injury or accidental shooting, especially if the gun is "chambered" meaning that you carry or store with one bullet already in the breech. Glocks are for experienced shooters. They should not be a "first-gun."

Incidentally, I'm not prejudiced -- I've owned both a .357 sig and a .40 cal Glock at one time.

Here are my recommendations:

If you're going to go the semi-auto route, I've always liked Taurus. They're decently made and reasonably priced. The various 9mm models that I've owned have been almost perfect in their reliability and ability to "digest" almost any ammo you throw into them. I haven't fired any of the latest models but I've owned several of the old PT series such as the 99 and the 111. These guns fit my smallish hands perfectly. Now here's the nice thing about them, they have a safety that also doubles as a "de-cocker." That is, it's a three-position safety. On, off, and de-cock. That means that if you've put the gun into "battery" by pulling back the slide to chamber a bullet, and the hammer is back and ready to rock in single-action mode, and then you change your mind, de-cocking will return the gun to double-action (much harder trigger pull) mode and lower the hammer safely. They also disassemble easily for cleaning after a day at the range.

Many Rugers have this feature as well, and they're good guns too, though I find the grips, again, too large.

Keep in mind that even the best semi-automatic pistols can jamb. In a life or death moment... So let me go further:

I might suggest an alternative for your first gun -- a revolver. True, no safety, but revolvers are double-action, meaning you have to pull the trigger some distance to first bring the hammer back (cock-it,) and then more to fire. (Yes, revolvers with exposed hammers can also be shot by you pulling the hammer back yourself and then pulling the trigger a bit.)

Revolvers are supremely reliable and incredibly easy to clean. Probably the only draw-back is limited capacity: Usually 5-7 cartridges. But if you're talking about home defense, that's probably all you would need, and besides, they're easier to reload in an emergency than a magazine for a "semi." (granted, you can own many magazines for a semi.) Furthermore, I recommend something in a .38 -- a perfectly respectable and deadly round, and far easier to handle, practice with, and much easier on the ears -- during an unexpected use where you don't have time to put on ear-mufflers -- than .357 mag. By the way, .357 magnums will shoot .38 so you could still get a .357 and get your feet wet with the .38 ammo before moving up to the higher-powered ammo.

Anyway, those are my thoughts on the subject. Good luck!

By the way, and I will NOT use your name or location at all, would you give me permission to put up this letter with my reply on Alphecca/Shooters -- there might be other readers (in fact, I'm sure of it) asking the same question?

Take care and have fun at the range. You'll find there are actually a lot of nice people there who will help you get started and coach you to improving your stance, aim, etc. Maybe because we always feel as if we're "under siege" by anti-gun forces, we gun-nuts tend to feel like a fraternity when gathered at the range.


In a followup email he mentioned:

Incidentally, I drove up to a firing range today, and the gentleman
there, who's been shooting for 40 years, and has owned the range for
many years, also recommended a 38 revolver. He told me that Glocks and
other semi's are guns you should "graduate" to. Most "newbies", he said,
get the Glock because it looks "cool" and it's one they have heard about
often, but that it was not a good choice. He explained to me to go ahead
and get the 38. It's inexpensive ($250 and up, as opposed to a Beretta's
$500+ tag), and if I find I enjoy shooting as a hobby, go ahead and
experiment with other, more expensive guns, like semi-auto's. He said
though, that because I am a beginner, and my primary purpose is to have
a gun at home, the 38 is ideal.

So I'm glad that at least someone agrees with me on the subject. One final note from me on brands:

On the subject of revolvers, I'm glad your range guy agreed with me. I forgot to add brands I recommend. Colt and Taurus and Ruger are all solid good buys, but I've always felt that Smith and Wesson made the best revolvers in the world. They're just works of art and feel good and work great and while new ones can cost $350 and more, a used one can go for less. For all of their political problems and ownership changes over the years, S&W revolvers are the standard everyone else tries to meet.

Anyway, I thought I'd share this with you all. Feel free to add your own comments (and I'm sure there will be a few -- gun owners are opinionated and like guitar players -- all have their own favorites and advice...)


Posted by Jeff Soyer at May 16, 2004 09:00 AM
Comments

Dear Jeff - While I don't currently own a gun, (living in NYC really has a down side), as a former hunter, shooter and member of an ROTC rifle team, I completely agree with your advice. Semis are not the weapon of choice for "newbies". An S&W .357 loaded with .38 ammo would be my suggestion and, with experience, would provide an inexpensive upgrade. Great advice! Keep up your fine work, (you are a daily "must read"). All the best, Terry

Posted by: Terry Reynolds at May 16, 2004 11:59 AM

Revolver is quite a good choice for a first-time user. And I would suggest a .357; with magnum ammo will stomp a bad guy if you have to use it, and you can practice with less-expensive .38's. And some of the .38 Special ammo out there is quite good, Hydra-Shocks for instance.

Posted by: Mark at May 16, 2004 12:51 PM

Good advice, Jeff. Your buddy's lucky he knows you.

James

Posted by: James R. Rummel at May 16, 2004 12:59 PM

Definitly go for the revolver in 357 mag and 38 for beginning proctice. It will be the gun you keep for a lifetime even if you buy others, you will always keep that revolver handy. Great job Jeff

Posted by: JT_Hunter at May 16, 2004 08:51 PM

Here's a quotation from "Cartridges of the World", 7th edition, 1993.

"The 38 Special is considered one of the best-balanced, all-round handgun cartridges ever designed. It is also one of the most accurate and is very widely used for match shooting. Any 357 Magnum revolver will also shoot the 38 Special. ......Because of its moderate recoil, the average person can learn to shoot well with it in a fairly short time, something not true of the 357 or 44 Magnums. The 38 Special is loaded by all major commercial ammunition manufacturers."

Posted by: Justthisguy at May 17, 2004 03:34 AM

I agree with the suggestion of a revolver loaded with .38 Specials, and I agree that it should be a .357 Mag revolver. However, I would recommend against either S&W or Taurus, because both now come with an internal lock. The internal lock does not provide sufficient security for an unattended gun, and is one more thing that can go wrong when you need the gun. There are rumors of the Taurus locks sometimes engaging during firing.
I'd also recommend chosing a finish for it's intimidating appearance; you want something that will not be mistaken for a counterfeit, since it's best it you don't need to shoot at all. Stainless steel finishes are best for that, blued steel is good too. The more exotic new finishes are not so good.
Also, stay away from any of the extra light (titanium or aluminum) revolvers. They are great backup guns for experienced double-action shooters, they shoot just like any other double-action revolver and the bullets go just where you expect, but the recoil makes them impossible to practice much with. I LIKE shooting my 57-oz. Ruger Super Redhawk .454 Casull, even with pretty hot .454 loads; I don't like shooting my 12-oz. S&W 340PD with any kind of .357 Mag.

Posted by: Charles at May 17, 2004 07:06 AM

I am probably a "newbie" as I have never owned a gun and have only fired guns a few times. Half of the guns I have used were black powder rifles at boy scout camp, which I do not recommend for new gun users to own, but were interesting to use. One of the modern guns I have fired was a .38 revolver (do not know which brand) and I thought it was pretty easy to use. I would also recommend a shotgun as I found the one I used easy to use, the shootee will most often not be getting up afterwards, and they look and sound really cool when you are pumping it, but it seems like your friend wants something that can fit in a small lockbox. Also I have seen shotguns priced very affordably ($180-500 range), but do not know how that corresponds to quality. I found your links very useful as I have been interested in getting a gun for a while, but do not know quite where to start.

Posted by: superfly at May 17, 2004 04:47 PM

Just to be a dissenting voice, I've never liked the way experienced shooters so readily discourage "newbies" from getting pistols. It think it depends completely on the shooter. The gun I was taught to shoot on was a .38 revolver, but the first gun I bought (about a month after taking my first class), was a 1911. I've never had a problem with it.

Revolvers have lots of virtues, but so do autos. And autos are not as complicated as some like to suggest. If you're too gun-phobic or mechanically disinclined to handle an auto, you probably ought to rethink owning a gun at all. In short, I'd recommend that newbies try both kinds, and buy whatever they prefer.

By the way, that goes for Glocks, too. I think they can be a fine first gun, as long as the shooter gets adequate training with a firm grounding in the laws of gun safety.

Posted by: Spoons at May 18, 2004 10:03 AM

I think your advice was exactly right, from the 38/357 recommendation to the plug for S&W (there really is no substitute).

Posted by: craig henry at May 18, 2004 10:05 AM

Actually, a shot gun would be the best choice for home defense considering this is a new shooter. Less chance of pellets going through walls; better chance of hitting intruder under stressfull situation.

Posted by: Tim Nunan at May 18, 2004 04:28 PM

I don’t know how many guns, mostly hand guns, I’ve owned, but it’s been a lot. Furthermore I was, back in the bow and arrow days a Special Forces medic. So, I kind of know guns from both ends. Any gun will be fine for home defense, as criminals are cowards and risk adverse and the mere presence of a weapon is very, very often enough to deter. Matter of fact, I’ve given old boxes of ammo, and NRA stickers to lefties to put in their windowsill of their house, just to give the usual suspects something to mull over. Anyways, if the expressed and displayed existence of a side arm, doesn’t work, the discharge will. A single shot, to a sneak, in the quiet of the night, is immensely loud, not to mention the quick flash of burning powder. Lastly, is a wound. I’d say even the most hardened amongst us, really get worried by a bullet wound, and could care less as to the smallness of caliber. Naturally, the sneaks and thieves, who well know that they could be shot, once having been shot, are now in their worst nightmare. Plus, there is that little problem of explaining at the emergency room. My two cents, get a used .38. With a 4 inch barrel. It won’t cost much and you can sell it back to the dealer for a $50 trade loss. You’ll spend way more than that on cartridges. The .357’s are a little heavy, and large in the hand. I don’t know anyone who hasn’t thought of shooting a .38 anything but sweet and fun. I also think shooting a revolver takes a little more practice, and once you are good on a wheelgun, an auto will seem easy. ‘Kind of along of the lines of when we used to learn to drive, we all started on stick shifts. Lastly, go to the range and you’ll never find a nicer group of people who will be more than happy to let you try their revolver or automatic. In the end, what ever you feel is best, will be best, as most of it all lays in your mind. Be safe, good luck.

Posted by: Paul Coyle at May 18, 2004 09:26 PM

Sorry Spoons, I have to agree with Jeff here. The 38 or 357/38 is a good choice. The letter writer specifically wanted a handgun that was easy to use and maintain and safe. Jeffs advice was perfect. I've been reading this blog for two months now and I'm impressed with him.
--a gunnut whos not gay--

Posted by: Nobody at May 19, 2004 12:12 PM

Plenty of beginners can start with an autoloader, as long as the shooter has access to a good instructor.

I actually started with a Glock 19. I liked the simplicity of the system - finger on trigger to engage, keep finger off trigger and the gun won't fire. In a life and death situation, fumbling for a safety may well get someone killed.

Glocks actually have three safety systems, but they all disengage with pressure on the trigger. There's the spur on the trigger - if the spur isn't depressed, the trigger won't move to the rear.

There's a firing pin block that is disengaged approximately halfway through the trigger pull, allowing the firing pin to move forward. The third safety is at the rear of the frame, and prevents the sear from releasing the firing pin until the trigger has moved all the way to rear.

With a round in the chamber and a finger OFF the trigger, it's very difficult to have an ND. I tell new customers, "If you put your finger on the trigger of a loaded Glock, you'd better be prepared to punch a hole through something."

People either love the feel of the Glocks, or hate them. The 9/40/357 frames fit me, but every time I pick up a 45ACP or 10mm Glock, I feel like I'm grabbing Oprah Winfrey's ass.

To the original poster: the key issue for you is comfort. Do you like the fit of the gun? Can you reach the controls? Are you comfortable with the features? Try out as many models as you can, and if you can, actually rent them at a range.

Don't let a gunshop employee force you into a gun that you're not completely comfortable with. A good gun shop will give you options and let YOU decide which one works for you.

For simplicity and reliability, a medium framed revolver in 357 Mag would work well. Consider the S&W 66, 686 and the Ruger GP-100 with a four inch barrel.

Bonne chance.

Posted by: flinch at May 22, 2004 09:58 PM

good game

Posted by: good game at July 9, 2004 10:47 AM

Well I pretty much know nothing about guns nore do I own one since I am only 16...but I do know if you don't want that intruder to get back up just shoot em once with the .500 Mag REVOLVER by smith & wesson lol.

Posted by: Kyle at August 2, 2004 02:40 PM
Note: Comments close down on posts after seven days and then
the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that.

By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...



Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah.
See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips.