|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
April 26, 2004Weekly Check on the BiasIf it's Sunday, it's Meet The Press. If it's Monday, it's Weekly Check on the Bias! There ought to be a way to combine the two, but -- rudely -- Tim Russert hasn't invited me on yet... Anyway, it's time to take a look at some of the newspaper articles and editorials linked to by Yahoo! on their Gun Control Debate Page. I also use other sources such as the always excellent Keep And Bear Arms and various other sites and bloggers. There was no theme to the past week so I'll indulge my own ego with a brief range report on my Marlin 9mm Camp Carbine. Long-time readers know that I REALLY like Marlin rifles A LOT. My 25N .22 LR is my favorite gun of all time. So recently, I took the scope off of my Camp Carbine (I just think a scope is somehow "cheating" on a non-hunting rifle) and last Thursday, my friend Jim took me to the Thetford range. In something that could never happen in an urban town, a generous guy died and left 300+ acres to the town of Thetford (VT) with the stipulation that his rifle range remain open to the public. For $10 dollars a year, you get a key to this great outdoor range with backstops setup at 25, 100, and 200 yards. I stupidly didn't bring a camera but will next week when I go again. There's also a nice covered pavilion with bench-rests and even a few seats. And a couple of outhouses.
I wanted to check the accuracy of the iron posts, so to speak. I'm happy to report that at 25 yards, the gun is dead-on. At 100 yards, the target was only a blur to my bad eye (one day I'll get glasses) and yes, you focus on the front sight, bring up the rear one, and then line it all up with the target, but the gun still managed to get most shots within inches on a target I couldn't even see... Imagine if I had vision-correction glasses. And I was using crappy commercially re-loaded ammo, too. The iron sights are set just fine. Enough of that. Let's "Meet the Press..." The Chicago Tribune had a reasonably fair follow-up to the NRA convention held in Pittsburgh. It rightly points out that many gun owners (and the NRA) will hold their noses and vote for Bush in November because the alternative -- anti-Second Amendment John Kerry -- would be much worse:
Notice they (the article writer) said "assault-style" rather than simply assault weapons. And added the qualifier that many consider that just cosmetic; much better than the Tribune usually manages and way above how the New York Times and Washington Post affect their prose on the subject. When examining bias in the media, we really can't hope for or expect more than this. On the subject matter itself, heck, we're all ambivilent on Bush. Certainly I've made my own thoughts on the matter clear here in the past. In regards to Second Amendment rights, the last line of this story sums it up:
Indeed. And despite my best attempts, I couldn't get Glenn Reynolds to run... The New York Post (usually a good friend to the pro-2A crowd) had the strange story of a cargo ship carrying several containers of firearms being stopped by Italian customs authorities. I covered it a few days ago so won't again. Anyway, they redeemed themselves with this brief op-ed by Arnold Ahlert about a store owner defending himself against a mutant:
And isn't it interesting, not to mention a perfect study in hypocrisy, to note that many of these politicians and Hollywood denizens actually have CCW permits yet they would deny others the same opportunity at self-protection? And that's the real problem -- these people consider themselves "better" than the rest of us common rabble. Sometime last year there was a story in the New York Post (no longer available on the web) about how Aerosmith's Steven Tyler and Joe Perry were granted CCW permits in exchange for concert tickets -- this in NYC where the average citizen can't possibly get a permit to even defend himself in his own home or store? And yet -- just to show how strong the "star treatment" is, remember, or at least I seem to, (I might be wrong but a quick search on Google for "Aerosmith Tyler Perry rehab" shows I'm probably not) that both Tyler and Perry did time in "rehab." And the last time I filled out the "instant check" form at a firearms dealer, you were supposed to indicate whether you had a drug or alcohol problem. Yet they were instantly, no red-tape, granted non-resident concealed carry permits. Did somebody say "double-standard?" This is the hypocrisy of the left: Do as I say, not as I do. Just ask Rosie O'Donnell, who rales against guns for the common folk while hiring an armed guard to protect her little darling... Speaking of hyperbole, which I wasn't, check out this Reuters story about the planned "Million Mom March" next month:
I emphasized the word "gigantic" to show what nonsense the bias of this article is. The "Million Mom March" has never gathered a million moms, anywhere. Aside from the misleading crowd figures shown clearly by SmartCarry.com and the fact that at the NRA convention last year in Florida, they managed only about 12 protesters, there's nothing "gigantic" about their movement. Indeed, a couple of years ago they had to layoff 30 of their 35 staff members. Let's plow on... Appearing in the Denver Post was a silly op-ed by Jim Spencer about how various Colorado politicians were planning to vote in the up-coming (if it actually does) vote on extending the phony ban on "assault weapons." I'm sure you'll be astounded to learn that this Denver Post columnist is FOR the extension. He goes through the list of Colorado's legislators and potential candidates, lamenting that most of them do not support renewing the bill:
Well. WELL! Where to begin?... First of all (he said, preaching to the choir) the definition of "assault weapons" is totally based on cosmetics. Does the firearm have a pistol grip? What is the magazine capacity? In fact, what the legislation really does is just prohibit a gun from looking scary! My Ruger P-95 operates exactly the same as a TEC-9 but it's not on the list because it doesn't include the "appearence" features that the AWB sponsors were trying to ban with this feel-good law. And by the way, Mr. Spencer, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were planning, originally, to blow the school apart with propane tanks. Should we be banning "assault barbecue gas-grills"? Notice how he lumps the NRA in with "criminals"? No bias here, huh? The San Francisco Chronicle also -- go ahead, gasp in astonishment -- calls for extending the "assault weapons ban" with this logic:
What if this killer had used a revolver? A knife? A baseball bat or tire-iron? Folks, it would still be cold-blooded, and awful, and wrong. It's not the gun, it's the mutant who misuses it! To quote a bumper-sticker, "Not Gun Control, Criminal Control." Stop trying to demonize a lump of steel and stop trying to prohibit law-abiding citizens from having the proper means to defend themselves, or just to furthering their sporting interests. Should we ban Porsches and Corvettes and other sports cars because a few individuals drive drunk? So... I always try to end on an up-beat note around here and from the Dallas Fort Worth Star-Telegram comes the story of a burgler having a bad day. Here are excerpts:
Weird, but... Well okay, just weird... So here's what some in the blogosphere are chatting up: James R. Rummel at Hell In A Handbasket gives his review of the Bersa Thunder .380 pistol, and compares it very favorably to the Walther PPK. By the way, the excellent Publicola has moved. Set your sights accordingly. And sites too. Naturally, Les Jones has his Thursday Gun Links up. Included is a review of .38 ammo. Kevin at The Smallest Minority sets his sights on a silly op-ed in the NY Journal News. Another excellent "fisk" and I'm glad I'm on Kevin's good side... Matt Rustler at Stop The Bleating reports that in Italy, the right to self-defense is gaining support. This after jewelry-shop owners shot a thief. My buddy Aubrey Turner has two photo posts up: The first is of a protest at the NRA meeting and the second is of a re-enactment of the French and Indian War. My secret girlfriend Bitter Bitch has more (and more photos) from the anti-NRA protest. Swen at A Coyote At The Dog Show agrees with me that size matters. Oh, actually he was talking about bullets. This one's for those of you into re-loading. By the way, John R. Lott, Jr. has a short piece in NRO about the phoniness of John Kerry's position on the Second Amendment. Read it! Okay, so that's not a blog post but I found it via John R Lott's blog... So, I guess that wraps up another edition of my Weekly Check on the Bias. As always, I thank you for stopping by. Comments
I sent Jim Spencer photos of Juniors shooting those hated AR15 assault rifles and mentioned to him the number of matches held every weekend and the safety record of NRA matches. Everyone should write Jim. He's very pleasant! Like reasoning with a ficus tree...he just stands there and drops leaves. Posted by: robert at April 26, 2004 02:53 PMWhile each may be considered an "evil", IMO one is MUCH more evil than the other. Posted by: Phil Winsor at April 26, 2004 02:59 PMContrary to claims in the media, Daniel Mauser was not killed with an "assault weapon." After his son Daniel was killed in the Columbine High School shooting, Tom Mauser became an activist for gun control. One of the cornerstones of his agenda is the further regulation of "assault weapons" (in addition to .357 Magnum revolvers). To this end, he has used the "fact" that his son was murdered by someone using an assault weapon; specifically the Tec-DC9. But publicly available evidence suggests that Tom Mauser is wrong about which firearm was used to murder his son.
1. Dylan Klebod was armed with a shotgun and Tec-DC9. 3. Daniel Masuer was murdered by Eric Harris
"But the time has come to understand that a TEC-9 semiautomatic
David Winkler, a freshman at CU and the co-founder of SAFE Students, "We were able to buy a Tek (sic) nine, 32-round semiautomatic assault Winkler said that the gun was the same type of weapon that killed
The Jefferson County Sheriff's Office official report states that Dylan Klebold was armed with the Tec-DC9 and a shotgun, while Eric Harris was armed with the Hi-Point carbine and a shotgun. Klebold was dressed in cargo pants, a black T-shirt that said “Wrath,” Harris, also wearing a black trench coat, wore a white T-shirt
Eric Harris wielded a black semiautomatic rifle produced by an
Under the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, the Tec-DC9 is an assault weapon, but the Hi-Point carbine is not, because it does not have a flash hider, threaded barrel, bayonet lug, or folding stock. While the differences are cosmetic, it was the proponents of the ban who decided that the Hi-Point carbine is not an assault weapon. (The same proponents have been complaining that firearms manufacturers who complied with the 1994 law have since been "skirting" or "evading" it by making the changes demanded of them.) As far as I know, this weapon was first made after the 1994 law, so no "high capacity" (ie - great than 10 rounds) magazines are available. The Sheriff's Office reported that Daniel Mauser was shot by Eric Harris in the library. The report does not say whether Harris used the shotgun or carbine to murder Daniel Mauser, but neither of those firearms are assault weapons, as defined by federal law and the proponents of the 1994 ban.
I have found no public evidence to support the claim that Daniel Mauser was killed with the Tec-DC9, or any other assault weapon -- as defined in 18 USC 921(a)(30).
While the press had no problem debunking the myth of Cassie Bernall being a Christian martyr, they never investigated the statements made by Tom Mauser in support of his political agenda, even though they've had five years to do so. Like the Bernalls, Tom Mauser seems to believe that the exploitation of his child's death is serving some higher purpose.
"Two weeks before Daniel was shot, he sat down at the dinner "It was not something we had ever discussed before. It was not The conversation, almost dismissed, became a revelation. "Once he was killed like that and it involved gun shows and
If Tom Mauser were lobbying for some right-wing cause, say banning abortion, the press would dismiss him as a religious extremist trying to force his beliefs upon the rest of society.
At the hearing, Tom Mauser was the only speaker who did not focus
I have no idea if Tom Mauser is telling the truth about his son's bringing up the "gun show loophole" shortly before his death. It is possible. On November 6, 1998 -- nearly 1/2 year before the Columbine shootings -- President Clinton directed the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General to close the so-called "gun show loophole."
Therefore, I request that, within 60 days, you recommend to me what
The SF Comical states that Officer Espinoza was killed with an assault rifle. This is impossible. Assault rifles have been illegal for 10 years under federal law and 15 years under California. And of course, we all know the law is effective. As a small side note, the killer of Officer Espinoza will not face the death penalty. The DA does not believe his case warrants it. Posted by: Ken Summers at April 27, 2004 10:39 AMhttp://www.cthulhu.org/
Violence Policy Center
Just read your blog from April and noticed your mention of "getting glasses." I read an article a while back discussing this and the author swears by an old trick of having an optometrist build a set of bifocals with the lenses upside down - the reading portion, (don't quit reading this yet), is actually put above the distance portion! Supposedly this really helps with doing the impossible, (even with younger eyes), task of focusing on 2 sights and a target...all at once, by concentrating on the front. It reads better than I can explain it but I have no idea now what gun mag it was in - check around on line and talk with your eye doc. Good luck with aging...it doesn't seem to get better! the comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |