Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right"
--Guardian (UK) 6/26/06

*******************


Yeah, so?


Even my cats
have guns!

serbu_sidebar_125.jpg
Me with Serbu BFG-50

Email me at:
gunnut -at-
alphecca -dot- com

Check it out:

My group sci-fi blog novel:

Colony: Alchibah






Featured in
Outdoor Life Magazine:

outdoor_small.jpg

Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer"

Alphecca gets noticed!
Check out these
GLOWING REVIEWS
I've just made up:

"Sparkles like pewter"
-- Collector's World

"Wonderful, terrific, splendid"
-- Roget's Thesaurus

"Really good"
-- Stereo World, Gun World,
Car World, Travel World,
Computer World, Roger Ebert,
Martha Stewart, Barney, etc...

"I am not an idiut"
--Barbra Streisand



Proud to be an American
US Flag
standing with Israel
Flag of Israel

PageSpinner

...but all errors and sloppy code should be blamed on me...

All non-credited writings
and photos on
Alphecca.com are
(C) Copyright
2002-2008
by Jeff Soyer
All rights reserved.



April 26, 2004

Weekly Check on the Bias

If it's Sunday, it's Meet The Press. If it's Monday, it's Weekly Check on the Bias! There ought to be a way to combine the two, but -- rudely -- Tim Russert hasn't invited me on yet...

Anyway, it's time to take a look at some of the newspaper articles and editorials linked to by Yahoo! on their Gun Control Debate Page. I also use other sources such as the always excellent Keep And Bear Arms and various other sites and bloggers.

There was no theme to the past week so I'll indulge my own ego with a brief range report on my Marlin 9mm Camp Carbine. Long-time readers know that I REALLY like Marlin rifles A LOT. My 25N .22 LR is my favorite gun of all time. So recently, I took the scope off of my Camp Carbine (I just think a scope is somehow "cheating" on a non-hunting rifle) and last Thursday, my friend Jim took me to the Thetford range. In something that could never happen in an urban town, a generous guy died and left 300+ acres to the town of Thetford (VT) with the stipulation that his rifle range remain open to the public. For $10 dollars a year, you get a key to this great outdoor range with backstops setup at 25, 100, and 200 yards. I stupidly didn't bring a camera but will next week when I go again. There's also a nice covered pavilion with bench-rests and even a few seats. And a couple of outhouses.


wgg042604.jpg


marlin.jpg


I wanted to check the accuracy of the iron posts, so to speak. I'm happy to report that at 25 yards, the gun is dead-on. At 100 yards, the target was only a blur to my bad eye (one day I'll get glasses) and yes, you focus on the front sight, bring up the rear one, and then line it all up with the target, but the gun still managed to get most shots within inches on a target I couldn't even see... Imagine if I had vision-correction glasses. And I was using crappy commercially re-loaded ammo, too. The iron sights are set just fine.

Enough of that. Let's "Meet the Press..."

The Chicago Tribune had a reasonably fair follow-up to the NRA convention held in Pittsburgh. It rightly points out that many gun owners (and the NRA) will hold their noses and vote for Bush in November because the alternative -- anti-Second Amendment John Kerry -- would be much worse:


And while the 4 million-member NRA is promising to campaign just as hard this year as it did four years ago to help Bush win election to the White House, some gun owners feel betrayed.

"Bush says he's pro-gun, but sometimes I wonder," Jennings said.

Dave Workman, senior editor of Gun Week magazine, said the acid test for many gun owners is how the administration handles congressional action on the decade-old assault weapons ban, set to expire in September.

The ban outlaws the sale of some assault-style semiautomatic weapons and limits ammunition magazines to 10 cartridges--restrictions that NRA supporters call "cosmetic" moves that have had no measurable impact on crime.

Bush has said he would allow the ban to be extended, a disappointment to many NRA members. But with a Republican-controlled Congress, it is questionable whether the bill even will get to his desk.


Notice they (the article writer) said "assault-style" rather than simply assault weapons. And added the qualifier that many consider that just cosmetic; much better than the Tribune usually manages and way above how the New York Times and Washington Post affect their prose on the subject. When examining bias in the media, we really can't hope for or expect more than this.

On the subject matter itself, heck, we're all ambivilent on Bush. Certainly I've made my own thoughts on the matter clear here in the past. In regards to Second Amendment rights, the last line of this story sums it up:


"There's no good third-party candidate, so it's going to be like picking between the lesser of two evils," he said.

Indeed. And despite my best attempts, I couldn't get Glenn Reynolds to run...

The New York Post (usually a good friend to the pro-2A crowd) had the strange story of a cargo ship carrying several containers of firearms being stopped by Italian customs authorities. I covered it a few days ago so won't again. Anyway, they redeemed themselves with this brief op-ed by Arnold Ahlert about a store owner defending himself against a mutant:


"Gun control," the liberal dogma that allows gun-toting punks to conduct an undefended reign of terror against small businesses is a fraud.

Let those body-guarded celebrities, politicians and elitists, who wring their hands at the thought of shop owners defending themselves, do a couple of night shifts at the local bodega. That should do the trick.


And isn't it interesting, not to mention a perfect study in hypocrisy, to note that many of these politicians and Hollywood denizens actually have CCW permits yet they would deny others the same opportunity at self-protection? And that's the real problem -- these people consider themselves "better" than the rest of us common rabble.

Sometime last year there was a story in the New York Post (no longer available on the web) about how Aerosmith's Steven Tyler and Joe Perry were granted CCW permits in exchange for concert tickets -- this in NYC where the average citizen can't possibly get a permit to even defend himself in his own home or store?

And yet -- just to show how strong the "star treatment" is, remember, or at least I seem to, (I might be wrong but a quick search on Google for "Aerosmith Tyler Perry rehab" shows I'm probably not) that both Tyler and Perry did time in "rehab." And the last time I filled out the "instant check" form at a firearms dealer, you were supposed to indicate whether you had a drug or alcohol problem. Yet they were instantly, no red-tape, granted non-resident concealed carry permits. Did somebody say "double-standard?" This is the hypocrisy of the left: Do as I say, not as I do. Just ask Rosie O'Donnell, who rales against guns for the common folk while hiring an armed guard to protect her little darling...

Speaking of hyperbole, which I wasn't, check out this Reuters story about the planned "Million Mom March" next month:


Alarmed that the U.S. Congress seems likely to allow an assault weapons ban to lapse, the women who organized the gigantic Million Mom March in 2000 are planning a smaller reprise in Washington this Mother's Day.

Organizers intend a smaller-scale protest this time, planning for tens of thousands instead of hundreds of thousands. They will gather on May 9 on the west side of the U.S. Capitol, a smaller venue than the expansive National Mall they used in 2000.

The goal is narrower too. The marchers are not trying to get new laws on the books this time but say they want to pressure Congress to renew the 1994 assault weapons ban, set to expire on Sept. 13.


I emphasized the word "gigantic" to show what nonsense the bias of this article is. The "Million Mom March" has never gathered a million moms, anywhere. Aside from the misleading crowd figures shown clearly by SmartCarry.com and the fact that at the NRA convention last year in Florida, they managed only about 12 protesters, there's nothing "gigantic" about their movement. Indeed, a couple of years ago they had to layoff 30 of their 35 staff members.

Let's plow on...

Appearing in the Denver Post was a silly op-ed by Jim Spencer about how various Colorado politicians were planning to vote in the up-coming (if it actually does) vote on extending the phony ban on "assault weapons." I'm sure you'll be astounded to learn that this Denver Post columnist is FOR the extension. He goes through the list of Colorado's legislators and potential candidates, lamenting that most of them do not support renewing the bill:


I'm not mentioning anyone's party affiliation. Banning assault weapons should not be about partisanship. It should be about representing "us."

Assault weapons are designed to do one thing - kill people.

Police and prosecutors favor banning assault weapons.

Criminals and the NRA don't.

Columbine killers Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold used an assault weapon, a TEC-DC9, along with other weapons, to murder a dozen classmates and a teacher and wound more than 20 people five years ago. Banning assault weapons would seem a matter of bipartisan common sense in Colorado.

Yet Allard and Campbell recently voted against extending the ban as they tried to defeat an amendment to a Senate bill that would have protected gun manufacturers from lawsuits. The amendment, which passed, would have extended the assault weapons ban as a condition of limiting gun-makers' liability.

The assault weapons ban amendment was one reason the NRA got its Senate benefactors to pull the liability bill. So was another amendment that Allard and Campbell voted against - a national requirement for background checks of gun buyers at gun shows.


Well. WELL! Where to begin?... First of all (he said, preaching to the choir) the definition of "assault weapons" is totally based on cosmetics. Does the firearm have a pistol grip? What is the magazine capacity? In fact, what the legislation really does is just prohibit a gun from looking scary! My Ruger P-95 operates exactly the same as a TEC-9 but it's not on the list because it doesn't include the "appearence" features that the AWB sponsors were trying to ban with this feel-good law.

And by the way, Mr. Spencer, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were planning, originally, to blow the school apart with propane tanks. Should we be banning "assault barbecue gas-grills"?

Notice how he lumps the NRA in with "criminals"? No bias here, huh?

The San Francisco Chronicle also -- go ahead, gasp in astonishment -- calls for extending the "assault weapons ban" with this logic:


THE DEBATE over the nation's assault weapons ban will be repeated this spring, with Sen. Dianne Feinstein arguing the need for extending her groundbreaking legislation. Lest she need any more ammunition, tragic news has provided it -- the recent cold-blooded slaying of San Francisco police officer Isaac Espinoza at the hands of a killer wielding an AK-47 assault rifle.

What if this killer had used a revolver? A knife? A baseball bat or tire-iron? Folks, it would still be cold-blooded, and awful, and wrong. It's not the gun, it's the mutant who misuses it! To quote a bumper-sticker, "Not Gun Control, Criminal Control." Stop trying to demonize a lump of steel and stop trying to prohibit law-abiding citizens from having the proper means to defend themselves, or just to furthering their sporting interests.

Should we ban Porsches and Corvettes and other sports cars because a few individuals drive drunk?

So... I always try to end on an up-beat note around here and from the Dallas Fort Worth Star-Telegram comes the story of a burgler having a bad day. Here are excerpts:


A break-in started badly and got worse early Tuesday for a man caught sneaking in a window by an armed homeowner.

Before it was over, the intruder was shot, thrown from a car and eventually arrested on suspicion of burglary, police said.

But the homeowner also found himself in custody even though police say the shooting appeared to have been justified...

...The homeowner, "who did not have his contact lenses in, saw a long slender object in the suspect's hands that he thought was a rifle," Jones said. The homeowner shot the intruder in the leg, Jones said.

The intruder dropped the rod and fell, Jones said. He rolled out of the garage and climbed onto a car sitting at the front of the house. The car sped away.

The homeowner recognized it as an acquaintance's car and chased it, Jones said. He said he saw the intruder tumble off but decided he was too far away to catch him and returned home.

At home, he called the acquaintance's cellphone, Jones said. The acquaintance said he didn't know what was happening and returned to the house.

Then the two men drove around until they found the bleeding suspect, Jones said. They called police, who arrested the 18-year-old man, and took him to the hospital...

...Police determined that the acquaintance was not involved in the break-in, Jones said.

However, officers arrested the homeowner on outstanding misdemeanor warrants, Jones said. He probably will not be charged in the shooting, Jones said.


Weird, but... Well okay, just weird...


So here's what some in the blogosphere are chatting up:

James R. Rummel at Hell In A Handbasket gives his review of the Bersa Thunder .380 pistol, and compares it very favorably to the Walther PPK.

By the way, the excellent Publicola has moved. Set your sights accordingly. And sites too.

Naturally, Les Jones has his Thursday Gun Links up. Included is a review of .38 ammo.

Kevin at The Smallest Minority sets his sights on a silly op-ed in the NY Journal News. Another excellent "fisk" and I'm glad I'm on Kevin's good side...

Matt Rustler at Stop The Bleating reports that in Italy, the right to self-defense is gaining support. This after jewelry-shop owners shot a thief.

My buddy Aubrey Turner has two photo posts up: The first is of a protest at the NRA meeting and the second is of a re-enactment of the French and Indian War.

My secret girlfriend Bitter Bitch has more (and more photos) from the anti-NRA protest.

Swen at A Coyote At The Dog Show agrees with me that size matters. Oh, actually he was talking about bullets. This one's for those of you into re-loading.

By the way, John R. Lott, Jr. has a short piece in NRO about the phoniness of John Kerry's position on the Second Amendment. Read it! Okay, so that's not a blog post but I found it via John R Lott's blog...

So, I guess that wraps up another edition of my Weekly Check on the Bias. As always, I thank you for stopping by.

Posted by Jeff Soyer at April 26, 2004 05:33 AM
Comments

I sent Jim Spencer photos of Juniors shooting those hated AR15 assault rifles and mentioned to him the number of matches held every weekend and the safety record of NRA matches. Everyone should write Jim. He's very pleasant! Like reasoning with a ficus tree...he just stands there and drops leaves.

Posted by: robert at April 26, 2004 02:53 PM

While each may be considered an "evil", IMO one is MUCH more evil than the other.

Posted by: Phil Winsor at April 26, 2004 02:59 PM

Contrary to claims in the media, Daniel Mauser was not killed with an "assault weapon."

After his son Daniel was killed in the Columbine High School shooting, Tom Mauser became an activist for gun control.

One of the cornerstones of his agenda is the further regulation of "assault weapons" (in addition to .357 Magnum revolvers). To this end, he has used the "fact" that his son was murdered by someone using an assault weapon; specifically the Tec-DC9. But publicly available evidence suggests that Tom Mauser is wrong about which firearm was used to murder his son.


Basically, everything documented below can be summed up by four facts:

1. Dylan Klebod was armed with a shotgun and Tec-DC9.
Under federal law, the Tec-DC9 is defined as an "assault weapon."
2. Eric Harris was armed with shotgun and Hi-Point carbine.
The Hi-Point carbine is not an "assault weapon."

3. Daniel Masuer was murdered by Eric Harris
4. Tom Mauser (and other activists) claims his son was killed with a Tec-DC9


Mauser told protestors that there are reasonable guns.

"But the time has come to understand that a TEC-9 semiautomatic
like the kind that was used to kill my son is not used to kill deer,"
he said.


Carla Crowder and Deborah Frazier
"8,000 rally against gun violence"
Denver Rocky Mountain News
May 2, 1999
http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/shooting/0502pro40.shtml


My son was shot by a Tec DC9, a 9 mm, semi-automatic gun with a
30-bullet clip. What practical purpose is there to this gun?
I have never known a hunter to use this type of weapon to shoot
a deer. Have you?


Tom Mauser
letter to Charlton Heston
May 11, 1999
http://www.danielmauser.com/HestonLetter.html

David Winkler, a freshman at CU and the co-founder of SAFE Students,
spoke about his growing frustrations with gun control. He said that
he and a few friends tested the gun-show loophole in June 1999.

"We were able to buy a Tek (sic) nine, 32-round semiautomatic assault
pistol," Winkler said. "We bought it in a half hour. There was no
background check, no ID check. The guy didn't even ask how old we were...
and it was obvious we were teenagers."

Winkler said that the gun was the same type of weapon that killed
Tom Mauser's son Daniel at Columbine High School.


"Guns topic of annual forum."
Colorado Daily
http://www.coloradodaily.com
October 3, 2000. pp. 1 -2


Tom Mauser, whose son Daniel was killed with an assault weapon
in the Littleton, Colorado, killings five years ago Tuesday,
said continuing the ban is common sense.


Associated Press
"Gun victim's dad wore son's shoes to NRA meeting"
April 17, 2004
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Northeast/04/17/nra.convention.cheney.ap/

The Jefferson County Sheriff's Office official report states that Dylan Klebold was armed with the Tec-DC9 and a shotgun, while Eric Harris was armed with the Hi-Point carbine and a shotgun.

Klebold was dressed in cargo pants, a black T-shirt that said “Wrath,”
and a black trench coat. Underneath his coat was an Intratec TEC-DC-9,
9-mm semi-automatic handgun attached to a strap slung over his shoulder.
His cargo pants had large pockets that later allowed him to partially
conceal a Stevens 12-gauge double-barrel shotgun, particularly since
the barrel had been cut down to approximately 23 inches.

Harris, also wearing a black trench coat, wore a white T-shirt
underneath that said, “Natural Selection.” He had a Hi-Point
9-mm carbine rifle on a strap hidden under his coat. Harris pulled
a Savage – Springfield 12-gauge pump shotgun from one of the bags
the gunmen carried to the top of the hill. Again, both its stock
and barrel were cut off, reducing the measurement of the entire
gun to 26 inches.


"How they were equipped that day"
Jefferson County Sheriff's Office report
http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/shooting/report/columbinereport/pages/equipment_text.htm


The Denver Post also reported that Eric Harris was armed with the Hi-Point carbine.


Eric Harris, one of the Columbine High killers, came to school April 20
with a HiPoint carbine with a 10-round magazine.


David Olinger
"Hi-Point maker feels mix of pride, pain"
Denver Post
August 1, 1999
http://63.147.65.175/news/shot0801a.htm


Aug. 1 - Dylan Klebold walked into his high school cafeteria carrying
an assault pistol originally designed as a submachine gun for the
white South African government.

Eric Harris wielded a black semiautomatic rifle produced by an
Ohio company whose owner says he just wanted to make guns for
the average working man.


David Olinger
"Following the guns"
Denver Post
August 1, 1999
http://63.147.65.175/news/shot0801.htm

Under the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, the Tec-DC9 is an assault weapon, but the Hi-Point carbine is not, because it does not have a flash hider, threaded barrel, bayonet lug, or folding stock. While the differences are cosmetic, it was the proponents of the ban who decided that the Hi-Point carbine is not an assault weapon. (The same proponents have been complaining that firearms manufacturers who complied with the 1994 law have since been "skirting" or "evading" it by making the changes demanded of them.) As far as I know, this weapon was first made after the 1994 law, so no "high capacity" (ie - great than 10 rounds) magazines are available.

The Sheriff's Office reported that Daniel Mauser was shot by Eric Harris in the library. The report does not say whether Harris used the shotgun or carbine to murder Daniel Mauser, but neither of those firearms are assault weapons, as defined by federal law and the proponents of the 1994 ban.


11:29 - 11:36 a.m.
Diagram 80 - While standing north of table #11,
Harris shoots under table #9 killing Daniel Mauser.


Jefferson County Sheriff's Office Report
"April 20, 1999 at 11:29 - 11:36 am"
http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/shooting/report/columbinereport/pages/sketch_0080.htm

I have found no public evidence to support the claim that Daniel Mauser was killed with the Tec-DC9, or any other assault weapon -- as defined in 18 USC 921(a)(30).


Posted by: Nobody Important at April 26, 2004 11:54 PM

While the press had no problem debunking the myth of Cassie Bernall being a Christian martyr, they never investigated the statements made by Tom Mauser in support of his political agenda, even though they've had five years to do so.

Like the Bernalls, Tom Mauser seems to believe that the exploitation of his child's death is serving some higher purpose.


In the agonizing days after Daniel's death, Mauser accepted
his cause, motivated by one passing conversation about gun-control
legislation that scarcely made an impression at the time.

"Two weeks before Daniel was shot, he sat down at the dinner
table one night and said to me, 'Dad, do you know about loopholes
in the Brady Bill?' Just out of the blue," Mauser said.

"It was not something we had ever discussed before. It was not
a subject in his debate class. My only guess is that he did
like to keep up on current events."

The conversation, almost dismissed, became a revelation.

"Once he was killed like that and it involved gun shows and
a loophole in the Brady Bill, that was clearly a sign to me,"


"Private grief and public campaign"
Joe Garner
Denver Rocky Mountain News
April 16, 2000
http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/shooting/0416maus4.shtml

If Tom Mauser were lobbying for some right-wing cause, say banning abortion, the press would dismiss him as a religious extremist trying to force his beliefs upon the rest of society.


In early November (1999), several of the victims' families came together
under different circumstances to testify at the sentencing hearing
of Mark Manes, the 22-year-old acquaintance of Klebold's and Harris'
who bought Dylan's semiautomatic Tec-9. With their suicide pact,
Harris and Klebold had cheated their victims of a day in court, so
this hearing might be the only chance for the families to describe
in a court of law what they've been through. Representatives from
nine families spoke, and the stories of suffering were so wrenching
that several people had to leave the courtroom and a clerk had to
get three extra boxes of tissues. When Manes was finally escorted
out of the courtroom in handcuffs, sentenced to six years in prison,
the families clapped. It wasn't much, but it was the first sense
of justice they had got since April.

At the hearing, Tom Mauser was the only speaker who did not focus
on the loss of his son. Instead, Mauser talked about guns. "I want
you to consider," he told the courtroom, "that we lose an average
of 13 young lives every day to gunshots. Every day. Every day."


The Report of Governor Bill Owens' Columbine Review Commission
Appendix E: "Special Report: The Columbine Tapes"
May 2001
p. 203
http://www.state.co.us/columbine

I have no idea if Tom Mauser is telling the truth about his son's bringing up the "gun show loophole" shortly before his death. It is possible. On November 6, 1998 -- nearly 1/2 year before the Columbine shootings -- President Clinton directed the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General to close the so-called "gun show loophole."


We can, however, take additional steps to strengthen the Brady Law
and help keep our streets safe from gun-carrying criminals. Under
current law, firearms can be -- and an untold number are -- bought
and sold entirely without background checks, at the estimated 5,000
private gun shows that take place across the country. This loophole
makes gun shows prime targets for criminals and gun traffickers, and
we have good reason to believe that firearms sold in this way have been
used in serious crimes. In addition, the failure to maintain records at
gun shows often thwarts needed law enforcement efforts to trace firearms.
Just days ago, Florida voters overwhelmingly passed a ballot initiative
designed to facilitate background checks at gun shows. It is now time for
the Federal Government to take appropriate action, on a national level,
to close this loophole in the law.

Therefore, I request that, within 60 days, you recommend to me what
actions our Administration can take -- including proposed legislation
-- to ensure that firearms sales at gun shows are not exempt from Brady
background checks or other provisions of our Federal gun laws.


Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
Gun Shows: Brady Checks and Crime Gun Traces
January 1999
"Exhibit 1: President’s Memorandum Concerning Preventing Firearms Sales to Prohibited Purchasers"
http://www.atf.gov/pub/treas_pub/gun_show.pdf


This was also the subject of President Clinton's weekly radio address of November 7, 1998, and Daniel Mauser may have been aware of this.


Posted by: Nobody Important at April 27, 2004 12:39 AM

The SF Comical states that Officer Espinoza was killed with an assault rifle. This is impossible. Assault rifles have been illegal for 10 years under federal law and 15 years under California. And of course, we all know the law is effective.

As a small side note, the killer of Officer Espinoza will not face the death penalty. The DA does not believe his case warrants it.

Posted by: Ken Summers at April 27, 2004 10:39 AM

http://www.cthulhu.org/
Cthulhu for President! Why settle for a lesser evil?

Posted by: B. Durbin at April 27, 2004 04:41 PM


Dylan Klebold walked into his high school cafeteria carrying an assault pistol originally designed as a submachine gun for the white South African government.


Contrary to claims by the Denver Post, the Tec-9 was designed in the predominantly-white socialist country of Sweden.


TEC-9—The 9mm TEC-9 assault pistol was originally developed by Interdynamics AB of Sweden and produced in the U.S. by F.I.E. of Florida. The original version, the KG-9, was easily converted to full auto and was subsequently reclassified as a machine gun by ATF in 1982. Soon after, the weapon was redesigned to sell as a semi-auto and reclassified the KG-99. Subsequently, a Hong Kong company bought the rights to the weapon from Interdynamics AB and a new company, Intratec USA, was formed in the United States to manufacture the weapon, now dubbed the TEC-9. In November of 1987, Intratec USA reorganized to become Intratec. Twelve and a half inches long, the lightweight TEC-9 comes with a 36-round magazine. The TEC-9M, a smaller version of the weapon, is 10.5 inches long. Both have threaded barrels so that they can accept silencers and barrel extensions. High impact plastic is used for the gun's receiver, magazine well, and pistol grip.[139] Promotional material for the guns describe them as being "high-spirited" and "weapons that are as tough as your toughest customers."[140] The TEC-9 retails for approximately $250

Violence Policy Center
Assault Weapons and Accessories in America
1988
"Appendix I"
http://www.vpc.org/studies/awaap1.htm


Olinger was probably confusing the 9mm Tec-9 pistol with the Street Sweeper 12 gauge shotgun, which must be a common mistake in newsrooms.


Posted by: Nobody Important at April 27, 2004 07:32 PM

Just read your blog from April and noticed your mention of "getting glasses." I read an article a while back discussing this and the author swears by an old trick of having an optometrist build a set of bifocals with the lenses upside down - the reading portion, (don't quit reading this yet), is actually put above the distance portion! Supposedly this really helps with doing the impossible, (even with younger eyes), task of focusing on 2 sights and a target...all at once, by concentrating on the front. It reads better than I can explain it but I have no idea now what gun mag it was in - check around on line and talk with your eye doc. Good luck with aging...it doesn't seem to get better!
Rich
50 in California

Posted by: Rich at May 30, 2004 02:43 AM
Note: Comments close down on posts after seven days and then
the comment input form disappears.

Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that.

By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...



Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah.
See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips.