|
Alphecca is a member of "the lunatic fringe of the US right" --Guardian (UK) 6/26/06 *******************
Email me at:
gunnut -at- alphecca -dot- com Check it out:
My Latest Blatherings...
Do We Need "Assault Weapons?" DC Congressional Seat Tied To Gun Rights Go Stats Installed Grass Roots & Gun Rights Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes. . . Gun Control Bills Advancing Bye-Bye SiteMeter Gun Rights in Texas KS Bill Would Overrule City Gun Laws Some Good News More on Alphecca and IE 7 More on Giuliani on Gun Control Bloomberg Pushes Pelosi on Gun Control NY: Now it's Bullet Control Trouble Reading Alphecca With IE7? Hit Job on Gun Rights Lawyer WaPo & Guns: A Good Question SCOTUS Review of DC Circuit Could Sidestep Central Issue George Will Warns Dems on Gun Control Meanwhile in Knife-Free Scotland. . . Dell Computer Support Howler of the Day Friday Bear Blogging Idiot of the Day on Gun Rights MO: Bill To Prevent Gun Confiscations Advances Proximity Laws Against Guns? No Slippery Slope? Stuck in Massachusetts Please Welcome... NY: Gov. Spitzer to Promote Hunting?
Care to comment?
Take your best shot:
Note: Comments close-down on posts after seven days.
Yes, I coined the term
"stupid-fucking-computer" Alphecca gets noticed! Check out these GLOWING REVIEWS I've just made up:
|
April 06, 2004Smiting SmutFolks, you regulars know that while I launch plenty of salvos at the left, I also lob a few at the right now and then. We've got a lot of problems in this country right now, not the least of which is that we're trying (as a nation, a government) to defend our borders from mutant terrorists. We're in the middle of a costly war in Iraq. Partly because of that (and also decreased tax revenues during the recent recession) and also because of other big government spending programs -- oddly enough -- foisted on us by the Republicans -- we're running a large deficit. I can live with that. But with all that is going on and all that we have to worry about, not the least of which is that we're in an election year, why the hell is the administration worrying about porno?
Is there really some urgent need for Ashcroft and the FBI and prosecutors et al to be tying up precious manpower, resources, and court time with this nonsense? And by the way, this is "adult" porno we're talking about. Consenting adults having sex and allowing consenting film makers to photograph it for consenting adult viewers. And remember, this is at a time when a sizable percentage of the VOTING public believes (rightly or wrongly) that government is abusing it's powers (in the name of Homeland Security) to intrude into our personal lives and liberties. This is Stupid. And if Bush thinks this is the stuff he needs to do to win in November, then he or his advisors need their heads examined. The radical right isn't that large a constituency. Indeed, actions like this probably repel more moderate voters than attract conservative ones. Idiocy!
Comments
Jeff, Congratulations on TWO very cool sites! Now I know who to bother the next time I have Movable Type problems.... This new anti-porn drive is being spearheaded by a guy I wrote a long, unpublished post about, and you make me feel very guilty for not finishing it. But isn't that what blogfathers are for? Posted by: Eric Scheie at April 6, 2004 05:49 PMWell, dust it off and put it up on your fine blog, Classical Values. It's nice that we can share a moment of mutual admiration here... But "I know nothing..." (for those of you old enough to remember Sgt. Schultz) about MT, yet... Posted by: Jeff Soyer at April 6, 2004 07:15 PMYeah but... but... JESUS wouldn't have downloaded pr0n! And it'll make you go blind and grow hair on your palms. Posted by: David Ross at April 6, 2004 11:57 PMMust be your magic touch Jeff! As I'm sure you noticed, we both got a Lanche -- in the same post! Now, if only the Bush Administration would hire you to replace Bruce Taylor at the Justice Department.... "Schultz, take him to the cooler!" Posted by: Eric Scheie at April 7, 2004 10:20 AMAm I the only person who read "Department officals say they will send 'nipples' through an industry..."? Posted by: Matt at April 7, 2004 02:47 PMAm I the only person who read "Department officals say they will send 'nipples' through an industry..."? Yes. Obviously, Matt, you've consumed so much pr0n that it has warped your thinking entirely. You are one of the millions of "victims" that, according to Herr Asskroft, have been "strewn...from coast to coast." I suggest you sue Hugh Hefner, Al Goldstein, Jenna Jameson, Nina Hartley, The Playboy Channel, your friendly neighborhood adult entertainment emporium, and Local 69 of the Streetwalkers' Union, not in any particular order. Posted by: Reginleif the Valkyrie at April 7, 2004 09:50 PMthe comment input form disappears. Your comments are welcome. You don't need to enter a URL and you don't need a "valid" email address, either. Note though that MT Blacklist is installed to flag suspiciously spam-like strings. Unfortunately, because of the bastard spammers, the strings "google.com" and "yahoo.com" (even in your email address) are currently banned as well. So are strings such as "cialis" (a common spam) which rules out words such as "socialism". Try putting a hyphan in a word like that. By Golly, you're reading an archived post. Click Here to head to the main page and read current stuff...Into science fiction? Check out my group blog novel, Colony: Alchibah. See the reader's guide there for first-timer tips. |