I firmly believe that when some retard-headed company uses shyster-headed lawyers to try to strong-arm the opinions of a blogger, they should be rewarded in the archives of Google. That’s why I just have to quote this:
You’re only going to draw more attention to a report that certainly sounds like a scam, a fraud, a rip-off, or a con. Because the next time that someone googles J. L. Kirk & Associates, or Kirk Associates, or JL Kirk, or JLK, or JLK-A, or sometimes just “Kirk“, they can’t help but be directed to Katherine Coble’s commentary about how she and her husband felt like they were almost caught in a scam, a fraud, a rip-off, or a con.
Not that I’m implying that J. L. Kirk & Associates, or Kirk Associates, or JL Kirk, or JLK, or JLK-A, or sometimes just “Kirk” are a scam, a fraud, a rip-off, or a con, I’m simply saying that their reported behavior certainly raises some red flags about J. L. Kirk & Associates, or Kirk Associates, or JL Kirk, or JLK, or JLK-A, or sometimes just “Kirk” and their reported activities because they are similar to those of other companies who are scams, frauds, rip-offs, or cons.
And be sure to read this and this and this and this and this just for starters.
Feel free to post links to your blog entry about J.L. Kirk in the comments here so it all gets spread around.
To “Kirk” or to be “Kirked.” I like it!
(*)
4 Responses to “New Verb in Town!”
on 12 Apr 2007 at 8:13 pm # Daniel
Let’s hope no one confuses this with Star Trek.
To be Kirked.
And Irked.
Then shirked.
on 12 Apr 2007 at 8:47 pm # Rey B
First rule of opening can of whoop-ass is not to have it pointed at yourself.
on 13 Apr 2007 at 10:01 pm # Kirk Parker
“To “Kirk” or to be “Kirked.” I like it!”
Hmm, for some odd reason, I don’t.
on 16 Apr 2007 at 10:56 am # triticale
Doesn’t the verk “Kirk” mean to attend, in Scotland, religous services?