No doubt the strongest gun control advocate on Forbes’ list of the fabulously rich, Bloomberg seized an opportunity to unseat Baca, a pro-gun Democrat, by spending $3.3 million on television and mail attacks. Given his estimated $25 billion fortune, $3.3 million is couch cushion change. But it was three times the sum Baca and Negrete McLeod raised between them. By homing in on a loyal National Rifle Association politician, Bloomberg altered a long-standing element of American politics.
[ . . . ]
“It sends a message: you can lose your seat by voting against prudent gun legislation,” said New York Deputy Mayor Howard Wolfson, the strategist who led Bloomberg’s campaign. “Hopefully, members will think twice before taking these votes. They can’t just vote the NRA’s way and assume they won’t hear about it.”
Three of the six candidates that Blowhard opposed, won anyway.
Say, isn’t threatening politicians for how they vote some sort of extortion or racketeering?
2 Responses to “Bloomberg and Gun Politics”
Leave a Reply
(Be sure to answer the anti-spam question!)