This looks to be the end for the NYC & DC lawsuits filed against several firearm manufacturers claiming that their legal products create a nuisance for the City. From (ironically) Bloomberg News:

The U.S. Supreme Court left intact lower court decisions shielding Smith & Wesson Holding Corp., Sturm, Ruger & Co. and other gunmakers from lawsuits pressed by New York City and shooting victims in Washington, D.C.

The justices, without comment, rejected appeals that sought to revive the two suits and challenged the constitutionality of a federal law signed in 2005 by then-President George W. Bush to protect the industry from a wave of lawsuits.

The New York and Washington suits were among dozens that sought to hold the firearms industry accountable for urban violence, claiming that manufacturers knew their weapons would fall into the hands of criminals. Most of those suits have been dismissed.

The New York suit, filed in 2000 by then-Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, sought court-ordered changes to industry practices to keep illegal guns out of the city. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York rejected the suit last year, overturning a trial judge.

Yes, this (NY lawsuit) was brought on by Rudy, but it could just as easily have been filed by his successor.

Fortunately, this doesn’t bode well for the still existent lawsuit filed by Gary, Indiana that has remained on life support from the courts in that state.

Incidentally, the most interesting part of the story is THIS:

President Barack Obama’s administration joined the gun industry in urging the Supreme Court not to question the constitutionality of the 2005 law, known as the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Like the Bush administration, Obama’s lawyers didn’t take a position on whether the federal law required dismissal of the lawsuits.