You know, the ones that welcome you if you open or conceal-carry? Now there’s an app for that.
You know, the ones that welcome you if you open or conceal-carry? Now there’s an app for that.
… from The Wall Street Journal:
What the map doesn’t tell you is in which of those “open carry” states, the cops will harass you anyway.
Attorney Alan Gura wins again. So do the law abiding people living in Washington, D.C. … Okay, what few there are.
A federal judge Saturday overturned the District of Columbia’s ban on carrying handguns in public on the grounds that it is unconstitutional.
“There is no longer any basis on which this court can conclude that the District of Columbia’s total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny,” said Judge Frederick J. Scullin Jr. in his ruling on Palmer v. District of Columbia.
Granted, if you’re living in a large, liberal city or state, it might seem futile. But, in the small town of Polar, Wisconsin (pop. 995) you should always be on top of what the town council or board is up to:
WFXS, MyFoxWausau - News and Weather for Wausau, WI
That’s pretty much what happens when some pro-gun groups get into everyone’s faces with open carry in coffee shops and restaurants. Some of this is also due to, I believe, anti-gun campaigns funded by Bloomberg.
Actually, not a bad article from the NY Times.
CCW permit holders can now carry in restaurants that serve alcohol, provided that the bulk of the establishment’s business is food and not booze. Off duty cops can now carry in bars. In addition, the state’s ‘Stand Your Ground’ law has been expanded:
The second bill signed by Jindal will expand the “stand your ground” law in Louisiana. Under current law, a person who kills an intruder coming into his car or house is given the benefit of the doubt and can use self-defense as a lawful reason for the killing. But the same self-defense argument could not be legally applied to situations where a person hurt, but didn’t kill, the intruder.
Metairie Rep. Joe Lopinto, the sponsor of the legislation, said he wanted to close that loophole. People who end up harming — but not killing — an intruder or a carjacker should not be charged with murder if those who kill those people don’t face those consequences, he said.
Prior, if an attacked citizen wounds, but doesn’t kill an intruder, he could have been charged with murder? And yes, that’s a question.
The rally brought dozens of sympathetic legislators to the steps of the state Capitol, and after an hour of speeches in a steady rain, those in attendance fanned out to make their case directly to the elected representatives. Speakers warned that Second Amendment rights are at risk and described pending legislation that could further broaden gun rights.
Rep. Rick Saccone, R-Allegheny, touted his proposal to eliminate the need for a license to carry a concealed weapon.
â€śThereâ€™s no reason we need the governmentâ€™s permission to put a coat over our weapons,â€ť Saccone told the crowd.
More at the link including other legislative proposals.
A brief synopsis of what presidential hopefuls said.
The nation’s largest gun-rights group, which officially opens its meeting of about 70,000 people Friday in Indianapolis, wants Congress to require that concealed-weapons permits issued in one state be recognized everywhere, even when the local requirements differ.
Advocates say the effort would eliminate a patchwork of state-specific regulations that lead to carriers unwittingly violating the law when traveling.
“Right now, it takes some legal research to find out where you are or are not legal depending on where you are,” said Guy Relford, a lawyer who has sued communities for violating an Indiana law that bars local gun regulation. “I don’t think that’s right.”
Opponents fear the measure would allow more lenient gun regulations to trump stricter ones when permit holders travel across state lines.
While I would welcome such nationwide reciprocity, I don’t think it’s going to ever happen. And, if it does, it won’t “allow more lenient gun regulations to trump stricter ones.” Does anyone really think that states with “may issue” and strict regulations are going to allow non-residents and travelers from non-strict ones to conceal-carry? Remember: These “may issue” and strict states include NY, NJ, and California; high-population states with a lot of Democratic representatives, and liberal senators.
Criticized by one group as the “guns everywhere” bill, Georgia took a big step Wednesday toward expanding where licensed carriers can take their weapons, with the governor signing a law that allows them in bars without restriction and in some churches, schools and government buildings under certain circumstances.
Well, good. Meanwhile, NewsBusters has a roundup of reaction from NBC, CBS, and ABC.
For once, they’re NOT like you and me only better:
A lively debate in the Louisiana Senate on Tuesday (April 15) grew deadly pretty quick during discussion about a bill members shot down that would let lawmakers pack heat in Senate chambers, among other places.
Nearly a dozen lawmakers were hypothetically shot and Sen. Jack Donahue victimized twice during a debate between the bill’s sponsor, Sen. R.L. “Bret” Allain, R-Franklin, and Sen. Karen Carter Peterson, D-New Orleans.
Not that they DON’T think they’re better, just that the discussion turned into a ‘laugh fest’ about shooting each other while trying to stop a real armed assailant.
A bill seeking to allow Tennesseans to openly carry firearms in public without permits has been defeated in a House subcommittee.
The House Finance Subcommittee voted 10-1 on Monday night against the measure sponsored by Republican Rep. Micah Van Huss of Jonesborough.
Van Huss says he’s abandoning his effort to get the bill called to the floor of the House.
Thousands of gun rights supporters rallied outside New York’s Capitol Tuesday to call for the repeal of gun control measures championed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, which they intend to use as a rallying cry in the fall elections.
Supporters of New York’s gun control measures â€” among the most restrictive in the U.S. â€” held a smaller event inside the Statehouse to announce several new bills, including one that would prohibit anyone from buying more than one gun a month.
Speakers at the larger rally on Empire State Plaza, including celebrity businessman Donald Trump and Republican gubernatorial candidate Rob Astorino, said the law prohibiting the sale of some popular guns like the AR-15 goes too far and should be scrapped.
“He took away your rights â€” you take away his job,” said Astorino, the Westchester County executive, urging those present to channel their opposition into political action.
A special thanks to reader Daniel Hackel, who sent along these pictures:
Senators passed a bill yesterday that creates a process for people to annul their mental health records and remove their names from a national gun background-check system. The vote was 17-7, with four Democrats joining Republicans after several attempts to table the bill.
[ . . . ]
Under the bill, anyone can file a petition with the court to annul their mental health records after termination of mandated guardianship, or after the expiration of an involuntary treatment or mandatory commitment order. A judge must grant the petition unless there is â€śclear and convincingâ€ť evidence that the personâ€™s mental state still poses a likelihood of danger to himself and others or might harm the public interest.
The bill still has a long way to go, including through the House, where passage is uncertain, and — of course — finally to (D) Gov. Hassan.
It ain’t over till it’s over, but — pending full court or SCOTUS rulings — there’s a trend coming (who’d a thunk it?) from the 9th Circuit:
Forcing citizens to prove to the government why they should be allowed to gain a carry permit is a process called “may issue.” With a may issue rule, government puts the onus on citizens to prove that they should be allowed to observe their Second Amendment rights. The Ninth Circuit essentially informed the California county that it must institute a “shall issue” rule, one that assumes the citizen is eligible for a permit unless government can prove otherwise.
This same rule has now been struck down for Hawaii and by the same Circuit Court.
With the case Baker v. Kealoha (9th Cir. Mar. 20, 2014), the Ninth Circuit ruled that Hawaii’s restrictions were just like San Diego County’s and the rules would have to be reworked to conform to earlier court decisions.
Here’s how the local TV station covered it — fairly:
Opposing all proposed anti-gun and ammunition legislation in Montpelier on the steps of the State House.
12:00 noon to 3:00 pm on Sunday, March 9, 2014
More at the Gun Owners of Vermont link above.
This is more important than ever, given that the City of Burlington just passed three anti-gun ordinances which the state legislature will have to vote on to approve or strike down.
Let me close by countering Mr. Frumâ€™s hypothesis with one of my own: â€śThe people who most want to carry are those who most clearly understand their responsibilities to their families, their friends, and their fellow man.â€ť They understand there is a difference between the protectors and the protected, and they donâ€™t want to place their lives in the stateâ€™s hands.
Read the whole thing.
The Ninth Circuitâ€™s decision in Peruta v. San Diego, released minutes ago, affirms the right of law-abiding citizens to carry handguns for lawful protection in public.
California law has a process for applying for a permit to carry a handgun for protection in public, with requirements for safety training, a background check, and so on. These requirements were not challenged. The statute also requires that the applicant have â€śgood cause,â€ť which was interpreted by San Diego County to mean that the applicant is faced with current specific threats. (Not all California counties have this narrow interpretation.) The Ninth Circuit, in a 2-1 opinion written by Judge Oâ€™Scannlain, ruled that Peruta was entitled to Summary Judgement, because the â€śgood causeâ€ť provision violates the Second Amendment.
This certainly has ramifications for gun holders in “may issue” states such as NY and NJ.